Demographics details for Broussard, LA vs Jefferson, MD
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Broussard, LA vs Jefferson, MD.
| Data | Broussard | Jefferson |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 14,186 | 2,742 |
| Median Age | 32.9 years | 41.4 years |
| Median Income | $94,912 | $137,667 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 51.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Broussard vs Jefferson
- In Broussard, the population is higher at 14,186, compared to 2,742 in Jefferson.
- The median age in Jefferson is higher at 41.4 years, compared to 32.9 years in Broussard.
- Jefferson has a higher median income of $137,667, compared to $94,912 in Broussard.
- In Jefferson, the percentage of married families is higher at 51.0%, compared to 41.0% in Broussard.
- Broussard has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 0% in Jefferson.
- The unemployment rate in Broussard is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.2% in Jefferson.
Demographics
Demographics Broussard vs Jefferson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Broussard | Jefferson |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 19 | 6 |
| White | 74 | 82 |
| Asian | 1 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Broussard vs Jefferson
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Broussard at 19% compared to 6% in Jefferson.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Jefferson at 82% compared to 74% in Broussard.
- In Jefferson, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 1% in Broussard.
- Jefferson has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 3% in Broussard.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Jefferson at 4%, compared to 3% in Broussard.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Broussard and Jefferson at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Broussard | Jefferson |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.9% | 14.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.5% | 7.8% |
| Depression | 26.6% | 20.4% |
| Smoking | 16.9% | 12.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.8% | 17.8% |
| Obesity | 36.1% | 32.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Broussard vs Jefferson
- More residents in Broussard report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 14.8% in Jefferson.
- Depression is more prevalent in Broussard at 26.6% compared to 20.4% in Jefferson.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Broussard at 16.9% compared to 12.6% in Jefferson.
- Binge drinking is more common in Broussard at 20.8% compared to 17.8% in Jefferson.
- Obesity rates are higher in Broussard at 36.1% compared to 32.1% in Jefferson.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Jefferson at 11.0% compared to 7.0% in Broussard.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Broussard | Jefferson |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (59) | 0.4% (10) |
| High School Diploma | 13.3% (1,881) | 18.8% (516) |
| Less than High School | 10.0% (1,414) | 2.3% (62) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.5% (3,043) | 27.4% (751) |
Education Levels Comparison: Broussard vs Jefferson
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Broussard and Jefferson at 0.4%.
- In Jefferson, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.8% compared to 13.3% in Broussard.
- More residents in Broussard have less than a high school education at 10.0% compared to 2.3% in Jefferson.
- In Jefferson, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.4% compared to 21.5% in Broussard.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.