Demographics details for Broomfield, CO vs South pasadena, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Broomfield, CO vs South pasadena, CA.

Data Broomfield South pasadena
Population 76,121 25,850
Median Age 38.6 years 40.6 years
Median Income $117,541 $127,882
Married Families 43.0% 45.0%
Poverty Level 6% 8%
Unemployment Rate 3.9 5.1

Population Comparison: Broomfield vs South pasadena

  • In Broomfield, the population is higher at 76,121, compared to 25,850 in South pasadena.
  • The median age in South pasadena is higher at 40.6 years, compared to 38.6 years in Broomfield.
  • South pasadena has a higher median income of $127,882, compared to $117,541 in Broomfield.
  • In South pasadena, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 43.0% in Broomfield.
  • The poverty level is higher in South pasadena at 8%, compared to 6% in Broomfield.
  • South pasadena has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 3.9% in Broomfield.

Demographics

Demographics Broomfield vs South pasadena provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Broomfield South pasadena
Black 1 4
White 71 31
Asian 7 34
Hispanic 13 19
Two or More Races 8 12
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Broomfield vs South pasadena

  • In South pasadena, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 1% in Broomfield.
  • Broomfield has a higher percentage of White residents at 71% compared to 31% in South pasadena.
  • In South pasadena, the Asian population stands at 34%, greater than 7% in Broomfield.
  • South pasadena has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 19%, compared to 13% in Broomfield.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in South pasadena at 12%, compared to 8% in Broomfield.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Broomfield and South pasadena at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Broomfield South pasadena
Mental Health Not Good 13.4% 11.9%
Physical Health Not Good 8.0% 7.1%
Depression 21.0% 13.8%
Smoking 10.4% 6.3%
Binge Drinking 19.6% 15.3%
Obesity 26.1% 20.9%
Disability Percentage 7.0% 7.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Broomfield vs South pasadena

  • More residents in Broomfield report poor mental health at 13.4% compared to 11.9% in South pasadena.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Broomfield at 21.0% compared to 13.8% in South pasadena.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Broomfield at 10.4% compared to 6.3% in South pasadena.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Broomfield at 19.6% compared to 15.3% in South pasadena.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Broomfield at 26.1% compared to 20.9% in South pasadena.
  • Disability percentages are the same in both Broomfield and South pasadena at 7.0%.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Broomfield South pasadena
No Schooling 0.4% (287) 0.7% (177)
High School Diploma 7.0% (5,357) 4.3% (1,111)
Less than High School 4.7% (3,593) 3.0% (766)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 40.0% (30,432) 53.2% (13,751)

Education Levels Comparison: Broomfield vs South pasadena

  • In South pasadena, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.4% in Broomfield.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Broomfield hold a high school diploma at 7.0% compared to 4.3% in South pasadena.
  • More residents in Broomfield have less than a high school education at 4.7% compared to 3.0% in South pasadena.
  • In South pasadena, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 53.2% compared to 40.0% in Broomfield.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.