Demographics details for Broomfield, CO vs Bixby, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Broomfield, CO vs Bixby, OK.
| Data | Broomfield | Bixby |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 76,121 | 29,800 |
| Median Age | 38.6 years | 36.8 years |
| Median Income | $117,541 | $93,765 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 3.3 |
Population Comparison: Broomfield vs Bixby
- In Broomfield, the population is higher at 76,121, compared to 29,800 in Bixby.
- Residents in Broomfield have a higher median age of 38.6 years compared to 36.8 years in Bixby.
- Broomfield has a higher median income of $117,541 compared to $93,765 in Bixby.
- In Bixby, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 43.0% in Broomfield.
- Broomfield has a higher poverty level at 6% compared to 5% in Bixby.
- The unemployment rate in Broomfield is higher at 3.9%, compared to 3.3% in Bixby.
Demographics
Demographics Broomfield vs Bixby provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Broomfield | Bixby |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 2 |
| White | 71 | 71 |
| Asian | 7 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 13 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 5 |
Demographics Comparison: Broomfield vs Bixby
- In Bixby, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 1% in Broomfield.
- The percentage of White residents is the same in both Broomfield and Bixby at 71%.
- The Asian population is larger in Broomfield at 7% compared to 4% in Bixby.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Broomfield at 13% compared to 7% in Bixby.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Bixby at 11%, compared to 8% in Broomfield.
- In Bixby, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 5%, compared to 0% in Broomfield.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Broomfield | Bixby |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.4% | 15.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.0% | 9.2% |
| Depression | 21.0% | 24.5% |
| Smoking | 10.4% | 12.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.6% | 15.7% |
| Obesity | 26.1% | 32.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Broomfield vs Bixby
- In Bixby, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.8% compared to 13.4% in Broomfield.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Bixby at 24.5% versus 21.0% in Broomfield.
- Bixby has a higher smoking rate at 12.8% compared to 10.4% in Broomfield.
- Binge drinking is more common in Broomfield at 19.6% compared to 15.7% in Bixby.
- Bixby has higher obesity rates at 32.1% compared to 26.1% in Broomfield.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Bixby at 8.0% compared to 7.0% in Broomfield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Broomfield | Bixby |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (287) | 0.5% (154) |
| High School Diploma | 7.0% (5,357) | 10.8% (3,233) |
| Less than High School | 4.7% (3,593) | 5.5% (1,652) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 40.0% (30,432) | 27.9% (8,313) |
Education Levels Comparison: Broomfield vs Bixby
- In Bixby, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.4% in Broomfield.
- In Bixby, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 10.8% compared to 7.0% in Broomfield.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Bixby at 5.5%, compared to 4.7% in Broomfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Broomfield hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 40.0% compared to 27.9% in Bixby.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.