Demographics details for Brooklyn, CT vs Cedar falls, IA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Brooklyn, CT vs Cedar falls, IA.

Data Brooklyn Cedar falls
Population 8,244 40,746
Median Age 41.5 years 28.0 years
Median Income $80,945 $71,011
Married Families Data is updating 36.0%
Poverty Level 6% 8%
Unemployment Rate 2.5 2.9

Population Comparison: Brooklyn vs Cedar falls

  • The population in Cedar falls is higher at 40,746, compared to 8,244 in Brooklyn.
  • Residents in Brooklyn have a higher median age of 41.5 years compared to 28.0 years in Cedar falls.
  • Brooklyn has a higher median income of $80,945 compared to $71,011 in Cedar falls.
  • In Cedar falls, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 0.0% in Brooklyn.
  • The poverty level is higher in Cedar falls at 8%, compared to 6% in Brooklyn.
  • Cedar falls has a higher unemployment rate at 2.9% compared to 2.5% in Brooklyn.

Demographics

Demographics Brooklyn vs Cedar falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Brooklyn Cedar falls
Black Data is updating 1
White 100 90
Asian Data is updating 4
Hispanic Data is updating 3
Two or More Races Data is updating 2
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Brooklyn vs Cedar falls

  • In Cedar falls, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Brooklyn.
  • Brooklyn has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 90% in Cedar falls.
  • In Cedar falls, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Brooklyn.
  • Cedar falls has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 0% in Brooklyn.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cedar falls at 2%, compared to 0% in Brooklyn.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Brooklyn and Cedar falls at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Brooklyn Cedar falls
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 15.5%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 9.0%
Depression Data is updating% 19.8%
Smoking Data is updating% 14.9%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 22.2%
Obesity Data is updating% 34.8%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Brooklyn vs Cedar falls

  • In Cedar falls, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.5% compared to 0.0% in Brooklyn.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Cedar falls at 19.8% versus 0.0% in Brooklyn.
  • Cedar falls has a higher smoking rate at 14.9% compared to 0.0% in Brooklyn.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Cedar falls at 22.2% compared to 0.0% in Brooklyn.
  • Cedar falls has higher obesity rates at 34.8% compared to 0.0% in Brooklyn.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cedar falls at 10.0% compared to 0.0% in Brooklyn.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Brooklyn Cedar falls
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.1% (43)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 9.6% (3,893)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 2.8% (1,147)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 26.8% (10,913)

Education Levels Comparison: Brooklyn vs Cedar falls

  • In Cedar falls, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.1% compared to 0.0% in Brooklyn.
  • In Cedar falls, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 9.6% compared to 0.0% in Brooklyn.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cedar falls at 2.8%, compared to 0.0% in Brooklyn.
  • In Cedar falls, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.8% compared to 0.0% in Brooklyn.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.