Demographics details for Brookline, MA vs Pana, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Brookline, MA vs Pana, IL.
| Data | Brookline | Pana |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 62,698 | 5,093 |
| Median Age | 35.1 years | 41.7 years |
| Median Income | $130,600 | $47,763 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Brookline vs Pana
- In Brookline, the population is higher at 62,698, compared to 5,093 in Pana.
- The median age in Pana is higher at 41.7 years, compared to 35.1 years in Brookline.
- Brookline has a higher median income of $130,600 compared to $47,763 in Pana.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Brookline at 38.0% compared to 32.0% in Pana.
- The poverty level is higher in Pana at 10%, compared to 7% in Brookline.
- Pana has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 2.5% in Brookline.
Demographics
Demographics Brookline vs Pana provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Brookline | Pana |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | Data is updating |
| White | 64 | 93 |
| Asian | 18 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Brookline vs Pana
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Brookline at 3% compared to 0% in Pana.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Pana at 93% compared to 64% in Brookline.
- The Asian population is larger in Brookline at 18% compared to 1% in Pana.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Brookline at 7% compared to 3% in Pana.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Brookline at 8% compared to 3% in Pana.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Brookline and Pana at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Brookline | Pana |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.7% | 17.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.1% | 12.5% |
| Depression | 19.5% | 22.8% |
| Smoking | 8.1% | 21.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.1% | 17.5% |
| Obesity | 22.9% | 39.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Brookline vs Pana
- In Pana, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 12.7% in Brookline.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Pana at 22.8% versus 19.5% in Brookline.
- Pana has a higher smoking rate at 21.3% compared to 8.1% in Brookline.
- Binge drinking is more common in Brookline at 18.1% compared to 17.5% in Pana.
- Pana has higher obesity rates at 39.1% compared to 22.9% in Brookline.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Pana at 16.0% compared to 7.0% in Brookline.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Brookline | Pana |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (288) | 0.4% (21) |
| High School Diploma | 3.2% (1,995) | 30.7% (1,563) |
| Less than High School | 2.3% (1,437) | 17.1% (870) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 56.6% (35,500) | 11.0% (559) |
Education Levels Comparison: Brookline vs Pana
- A higher percentage of residents in Brookline have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.4% in Pana.
- In Pana, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 30.7% compared to 3.2% in Brookline.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Pana at 17.1%, compared to 2.3% in Brookline.
- A higher percentage of residents in Brookline hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 56.6% compared to 11.0% in Pana.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.