Demographics details for Brookings, SD vs Spanish fork, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Brookings, SD vs Spanish fork, UT.
Data | Brookings | Spanish fork |
---|---|---|
Population | 23,993 | 44,102 |
Median Age | 24.5 years | 27.4 years |
Median Income | $57,824 | $93,989 |
Married Families | 27.0% | 43.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 6% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.3 | 3.8 |
Population Comparison: Brookings vs Spanish fork
- The population in Spanish fork is higher at 44,102, compared to 23,993 in Brookings.
- The median age in Spanish fork is higher at 27.4 years, compared to 24.5 years in Brookings.
- Spanish fork has a higher median income of $93,989, compared to $57,824 in Brookings.
- In Spanish fork, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 27.0% in Brookings.
- Brookings has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 6% in Spanish fork.
- Spanish fork has a higher unemployment rate at 3.8% compared to 2.3% in Brookings.
Demographics
Demographics Brookings vs Spanish fork provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Brookings | Spanish fork |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 1 |
White | 84 | 80 |
Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 4 | 12 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 7 |
American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Brookings vs Spanish fork
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Brookings at 2% compared to 1% in Spanish fork.
- Brookings has a higher percentage of White residents at 84% compared to 80% in Spanish fork.
- The Asian population is larger in Brookings at 4% compared to 0% in Spanish fork.
- Spanish fork has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 4% in Brookings.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Spanish fork at 7%, compared to 4% in Brookings.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Brookings at 2% compared to 0% in Spanish fork.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Brookings | Spanish fork |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 12.7% | 15.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.7% | 10.8% |
Depression | 18.7% | 23.8% |
Smoking | 14.9% | 7.7% |
Binge Drinking | 20.5% | 8.3% |
Obesity | 34.2% | 31.0% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Brookings vs Spanish fork
- In Spanish fork, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.0% compared to 12.7% in Brookings.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Spanish fork at 23.8% versus 18.7% in Brookings.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Brookings at 14.9% compared to 7.7% in Spanish fork.
- Binge drinking is more common in Brookings at 20.5% compared to 8.3% in Spanish fork.
- Obesity rates are higher in Brookings at 34.2% compared to 31.0% in Spanish fork.
- Disability percentages are higher in Brookings at 9.0% compared to 8.0% in Spanish fork.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Brookings | Spanish fork |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.2% (58) | 0.4% (175) |
High School Diploma | 7.7% (1,837) | 9.1% (4,010) |
Less than High School | 3.4% (822) | 5.9% (2,583) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.1% (5,531) | 19.4% (8,546) |
Education Levels Comparison: Brookings vs Spanish fork
- In Spanish fork, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.2% in Brookings.
- In Spanish fork, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 9.1% compared to 7.7% in Brookings.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Spanish fork at 5.9%, compared to 3.4% in Brookings.
- A higher percentage of residents in Brookings hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.1% compared to 19.4% in Spanish fork.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.