Demographics details for Brookings, SD vs Maple valley, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Brookings, SD vs Maple valley, WA.
Data | Brookings | Maple valley |
---|---|---|
Population | 23,993 | 28,220 |
Median Age | 24.5 years | 36.4 years |
Median Income | $57,824 | $137,595 |
Married Families | 27.0% | 47.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 2.3 | 4.7 |
Population Comparison: Brookings vs Maple valley
- The population in Maple valley is higher at 28,220, compared to 23,993 in Brookings.
- The median age in Maple valley is higher at 36.4 years, compared to 24.5 years in Brookings.
- Maple valley has a higher median income of $137,595, compared to $57,824 in Brookings.
- In Maple valley, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 27.0% in Brookings.
- Brookings has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 0% in Maple valley.
- Maple valley has a higher unemployment rate at 4.7% compared to 2.3% in Brookings.
Demographics
Demographics Brookings vs Maple valley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Brookings | Maple valley |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 2 |
White | 84 | 74 |
Asian | 4 | 11 |
Hispanic | 4 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 8 |
American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Brookings vs Maple valley
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Brookings and Maple valley at 2%.
- Brookings has a higher percentage of White residents at 84% compared to 74% in Maple valley.
- In Maple valley, the Asian population stands at 11%, greater than 4% in Brookings.
- Maple valley has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 4% in Brookings.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Maple valley at 8%, compared to 4% in Brookings.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Brookings at 2% compared to 0% in Maple valley.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Brookings | Maple valley |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 12.7% | 15.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.7% | 8.6% |
Depression | 18.7% | 25.8% |
Smoking | 14.9% | 9.4% |
Binge Drinking | 20.5% | 19.6% |
Obesity | 34.2% | 24.3% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Brookings vs Maple valley
- In Maple valley, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.9% compared to 12.7% in Brookings.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Maple valley at 25.8% versus 18.7% in Brookings.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Brookings at 14.9% compared to 9.4% in Maple valley.
- Binge drinking is more common in Brookings at 20.5% compared to 19.6% in Maple valley.
- Obesity rates are higher in Brookings at 34.2% compared to 24.3% in Maple valley.
- Disability percentages are higher in Brookings at 9.0% compared to 7.0% in Maple valley.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Brookings | Maple valley |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.2% (58) | 0.4% (103) |
High School Diploma | 7.7% (1,837) | 10.2% (2,878) |
Less than High School | 3.4% (822) | 3.1% (879) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.1% (5,531) | 28.5% (8,032) |
Education Levels Comparison: Brookings vs Maple valley
- In Maple valley, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.2% in Brookings.
- In Maple valley, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 10.2% compared to 7.7% in Brookings.
- More residents in Brookings have less than a high school education at 3.4% compared to 3.1% in Maple valley.
- In Maple valley, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.5% compared to 23.1% in Brookings.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.