Demographics details for Brookings, SD vs Keizer, OR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Brookings, SD vs Keizer, OR.
Data | Brookings | Keizer |
---|---|---|
Population | 23,993 | 38,704 |
Median Age | 24.5 years | 35.8 years |
Median Income | $57,824 | $75,753 |
Married Families | 27.0% | 38.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.3 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Brookings vs Keizer
- The population in Keizer is higher at 38,704, compared to 23,993 in Brookings.
- The median age in Keizer is higher at 35.8 years, compared to 24.5 years in Brookings.
- Keizer has a higher median income of $75,753, compared to $57,824 in Brookings.
- In Keizer, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 27.0% in Brookings.
- Brookings has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 10% in Keizer.
- Keizer has a higher unemployment rate at 3.6% compared to 2.3% in Brookings.
Demographics
Demographics Brookings vs Keizer provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Brookings | Keizer |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 1 |
White | 84 | 58 |
Asian | 4 | 1 |
Hispanic | 4 | 25 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 14 |
American Indian | 2 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Brookings vs Keizer
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Brookings at 2% compared to 1% in Keizer.
- Brookings has a higher percentage of White residents at 84% compared to 58% in Keizer.
- The Asian population is larger in Brookings at 4% compared to 1% in Keizer.
- Keizer has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 25%, compared to 4% in Brookings.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Keizer at 14%, compared to 4% in Brookings.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Brookings at 2% compared to 1% in Keizer.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Brookings | Keizer |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 12.7% | 17.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.7% | 11.4% |
Depression | 18.7% | 28.5% |
Smoking | 14.9% | 15.4% |
Binge Drinking | 20.5% | 16.5% |
Obesity | 34.2% | 35.7% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Brookings vs Keizer
- In Keizer, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 12.7% in Brookings.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Keizer at 28.5% versus 18.7% in Brookings.
- Keizer has a higher smoking rate at 15.4% compared to 14.9% in Brookings.
- Binge drinking is more common in Brookings at 20.5% compared to 16.5% in Keizer.
- Keizer has higher obesity rates at 35.7% compared to 34.2% in Brookings.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Keizer at 16.0% compared to 9.0% in Brookings.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Brookings | Keizer |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.2% (58) | 1.8% (685) |
High School Diploma | 7.7% (1,837) | 12.7% (4,898) |
Less than High School | 3.4% (822) | 13.9% (5,363) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.1% (5,531) | 17.1% (6,617) |
Education Levels Comparison: Brookings vs Keizer
- In Keizer, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.2% in Brookings.
- In Keizer, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.7% compared to 7.7% in Brookings.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Keizer at 13.9%, compared to 3.4% in Brookings.
- A higher percentage of residents in Brookings hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.1% compared to 17.1% in Keizer.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.