Demographics details for Brookings, SD vs Fairfield, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Brookings, SD vs Fairfield, CA.
| Data | Brookings | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 23,993 | 119,338 |
| Median Age | 24.5 years | 35.8 years |
| Median Income | $57,824 | $98,857 |
| Married Families | 27.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.3 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Brookings vs Fairfield
- The population in Fairfield is higher at 119,338, compared to 23,993 in Brookings.
- The median age in Fairfield is higher at 35.8 years, compared to 24.5 years in Brookings.
- Fairfield has a higher median income of $98,857, compared to $57,824 in Brookings.
- In Fairfield, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 27.0% in Brookings.
- The poverty level is identical in both Brookings and Fairfield at 12%.
- Fairfield has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 2.3% in Brookings.
Demographics
Demographics Brookings vs Fairfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Brookings | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 15 |
| White | 84 | 23 |
| Asian | 4 | 18 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 30 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 14 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Brookings vs Fairfield
- In Fairfield, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 15% compared to 2% in Brookings.
- Brookings has a higher percentage of White residents at 84% compared to 23% in Fairfield.
- In Fairfield, the Asian population stands at 18%, greater than 4% in Brookings.
- Fairfield has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 30%, compared to 4% in Brookings.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fairfield at 14%, compared to 4% in Brookings.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Brookings at 2% compared to 0% in Fairfield.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Brookings | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.7% | 15.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.7% | 10.7% |
| Depression | 18.7% | 17.7% |
| Smoking | 14.9% | 11.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.5% | 16.1% |
| Obesity | 34.2% | 30.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Brookings vs Fairfield
- In Fairfield, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.8% compared to 12.7% in Brookings.
- Depression is more prevalent in Brookings at 18.7% compared to 17.7% in Fairfield.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Brookings at 14.9% compared to 11.9% in Fairfield.
- Binge drinking is more common in Brookings at 20.5% compared to 16.1% in Fairfield.
- Obesity rates are higher in Brookings at 34.2% compared to 30.1% in Fairfield.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fairfield at 12.0% compared to 9.0% in Brookings.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Brookings | Fairfield |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (58) | 2.1% (2,515) |
| High School Diploma | 7.7% (1,837) | 13.7% (16,358) |
| Less than High School | 3.4% (822) | 14.6% (17,464) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.1% (5,531) | 18.3% (21,856) |
Education Levels Comparison: Brookings vs Fairfield
- In Fairfield, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.2% in Brookings.
- In Fairfield, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.7% compared to 7.7% in Brookings.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fairfield at 14.6%, compared to 3.4% in Brookings.
- A higher percentage of residents in Brookings hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.1% compared to 18.3% in Fairfield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.