Demographics details for Brookhaven, MS vs Mobile, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Brookhaven, MS vs Mobile, AL.
| Data | Brookhaven | Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 11,608 | 183,289 |
| Median Age | 42.0 years | 37.6 years |
| Median Income | $32,869 | $48,524 |
| Married Families | 28.0% | 30.0% |
| Poverty Level | 20% | 21% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Brookhaven vs Mobile
- The population in Mobile is higher at 183,289, compared to 11,608 in Brookhaven.
- Residents in Brookhaven have a higher median age of 42.0 years compared to 37.6 years in Mobile.
- Mobile has a higher median income of $48,524, compared to $32,869 in Brookhaven.
- In Mobile, the percentage of married families is higher at 30.0%, compared to 28.0% in Brookhaven.
- The poverty level is higher in Mobile at 21%, compared to 20% in Brookhaven.
- The unemployment rate in Brookhaven is higher at 5.1%, compared to 3.9% in Mobile.
Demographics
Demographics Brookhaven vs Mobile provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Brookhaven | Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 57 | 54 |
| White | 39 | 38 |
| Asian | 2 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Brookhaven vs Mobile
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Brookhaven at 57% compared to 54% in Mobile.
- Brookhaven has a higher percentage of White residents at 39% compared to 38% in Mobile.
- Both Brookhaven and Mobile have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- Mobile has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 2% in Brookhaven.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Mobile at 3%, compared to 0% in Brookhaven.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Brookhaven and Mobile at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Brookhaven | Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.0% | 19.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.6% | 13.5% |
| Depression | 21.5% | 21.7% |
| Smoking | 21.2% | 18.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.4% | 15.1% |
| Obesity | 45.4% | 42.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Brookhaven vs Mobile
- In Mobile, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 18.0% in Brookhaven.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Mobile at 21.7% versus 21.5% in Brookhaven.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Brookhaven at 21.2% compared to 18.6% in Mobile.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Mobile at 15.1% compared to 12.4% in Brookhaven.
- Obesity rates are higher in Brookhaven at 45.4% compared to 42.0% in Mobile.
- Disability percentages are higher in Brookhaven at 18.0% compared to 13.0% in Mobile.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Brookhaven | Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (96) | 0.7% (1,270) |
| High School Diploma | 19.7% (2,281) | 18.4% (33,785) |
| Less than High School | 11.7% (1,357) | 9.4% (17,177) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.6% (1,696) | 20.9% (38,346) |
Education Levels Comparison: Brookhaven vs Mobile
- A higher percentage of residents in Brookhaven have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.7% in Mobile.
- A higher percentage of residents in Brookhaven hold a high school diploma at 19.7% compared to 18.4% in Mobile.
- More residents in Brookhaven have less than a high school education at 11.7% compared to 9.4% in Mobile.
- In Mobile, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.9% compared to 14.6% in Brookhaven.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.