Demographics details for Brookhaven, MS vs Kent, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Brookhaven, MS vs Kent, WA.
| Data | Brookhaven | Kent |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 11,608 | 134,392 |
| Median Age | 42.0 years | 34.7 years |
| Median Income | $32,869 | $86,966 |
| Married Families | 28.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 20% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 5.6 |
Population Comparison: Brookhaven vs Kent
- The population in Kent is higher at 134,392, compared to 11,608 in Brookhaven.
- Residents in Brookhaven have a higher median age of 42.0 years compared to 34.7 years in Kent.
- Kent has a higher median income of $86,966, compared to $32,869 in Brookhaven.
- In Kent, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 28.0% in Brookhaven.
- Brookhaven has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 9% in Kent.
- Kent has a higher unemployment rate at 5.6% compared to 5.1% in Brookhaven.
Demographics
Demographics Brookhaven vs Kent provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Brookhaven | Kent |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 57 | 13 |
| White | 39 | 37 |
| Asian | 2 | 23 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 16 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Brookhaven vs Kent
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Brookhaven at 57% compared to 13% in Kent.
- Brookhaven has a higher percentage of White residents at 39% compared to 37% in Kent.
- In Kent, the Asian population stands at 23%, greater than 2% in Brookhaven.
- Kent has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 16%, compared to 2% in Brookhaven.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Kent at 10%, compared to 0% in Brookhaven.
- In Kent, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Brookhaven.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Brookhaven | Kent |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.0% | 17.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.6% | 11.4% |
| Depression | 21.5% | 24.8% |
| Smoking | 21.2% | 13.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.4% | 16.1% |
| Obesity | 45.4% | 27.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Brookhaven vs Kent
- More residents in Brookhaven report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 17.9% in Kent.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Kent at 24.8% versus 21.5% in Brookhaven.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Brookhaven at 21.2% compared to 13.6% in Kent.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Kent at 16.1% compared to 12.4% in Brookhaven.
- Obesity rates are higher in Brookhaven at 45.4% compared to 27.2% in Kent.
- Disability percentages are higher in Brookhaven at 18.0% compared to 10.0% in Kent.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Brookhaven | Kent |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (96) | 2.1% (2,872) |
| High School Diploma | 19.7% (2,281) | 14.6% (19,603) |
| Less than High School | 11.7% (1,357) | 12.9% (17,326) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.6% (1,696) | 18.5% (24,855) |
Education Levels Comparison: Brookhaven vs Kent
- In Kent, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.8% in Brookhaven.
- A higher percentage of residents in Brookhaven hold a high school diploma at 19.7% compared to 14.6% in Kent.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Kent at 12.9%, compared to 11.7% in Brookhaven.
- In Kent, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.5% compared to 14.6% in Brookhaven.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.