Demographics details for Brookhaven, GA vs Panama, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Brookhaven, GA vs Panama, OK.
Data | Brookhaven | Panama |
---|---|---|
Population | 57,934 | 1,284 |
Median Age | 34.6 years | 32.4 years |
Median Income | $114,570 | $44,397 |
Married Families | 36.0% | 34.0% |
Poverty Level | 7% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.6 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Brookhaven vs Panama
- In Brookhaven, the population is higher at 57,934, compared to 1,284 in Panama.
- Residents in Brookhaven have a higher median age of 34.6 years compared to 32.4 years in Panama.
- Brookhaven has a higher median income of $114,570 compared to $44,397 in Panama.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Brookhaven at 36.0% compared to 34.0% in Panama.
- The poverty level is higher in Panama at 12%, compared to 7% in Brookhaven.
- Panama has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.6% in Brookhaven.
Demographics
Demographics Brookhaven vs Panama provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Brookhaven | Panama |
---|---|---|
Black | 12 | Data is updating |
White | 53 | 68 |
Asian | 7 | 2 |
Hispanic | 17 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 9 | 19 |
American Indian | 2 | 8 |
Demographics Comparison: Brookhaven vs Panama
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Brookhaven at 12% compared to 0% in Panama.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Panama at 68% compared to 53% in Brookhaven.
- The Asian population is larger in Brookhaven at 7% compared to 2% in Panama.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Brookhaven at 17% compared to 3% in Panama.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Panama at 19%, compared to 9% in Brookhaven.
- In Panama, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 8%, compared to 2% in Brookhaven.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Brookhaven | Panama |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.1% | 21.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.6% | 15.3% |
Depression | 17.8% | 27.3% |
Smoking | 10.0% | 25.1% |
Binge Drinking | 16.2% | 14.1% |
Obesity | 27.2% | 42.5% |
Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 22.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Brookhaven vs Panama
- In Panama, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.1% compared to 13.1% in Brookhaven.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Panama at 27.3% versus 17.8% in Brookhaven.
- Panama has a higher smoking rate at 25.1% compared to 10.0% in Brookhaven.
- Binge drinking is more common in Brookhaven at 16.2% compared to 14.1% in Panama.
- Panama has higher obesity rates at 42.5% compared to 27.2% in Brookhaven.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Panama at 22.0% compared to 6.0% in Brookhaven.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Brookhaven | Panama |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (341) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 5.1% (2,980) | 29.5% (379) |
Less than High School | 8.0% (4,642) | 13.6% (175) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 50.3% (29,125) | 4.4% (56) |
Education Levels Comparison: Brookhaven vs Panama
- A higher percentage of residents in Brookhaven have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Panama.
- In Panama, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 29.5% compared to 5.1% in Brookhaven.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Panama at 13.6%, compared to 8.0% in Brookhaven.
- A higher percentage of residents in Brookhaven hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 50.3% compared to 4.4% in Panama.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.