Demographics details for Brookhaven, GA vs Fort washington, MD

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Brookhaven, GA vs Fort washington, MD.

Data Brookhaven Fort washington
Population 57,934 25,825
Median Age 34.6 years 44.1 years
Median Income $114,570 $143,623
Married Families 36.0% 43.0%
Poverty Level 7% 5%
Unemployment Rate 2.6 3.5

Population Comparison: Brookhaven vs Fort washington

  • In Brookhaven, the population is higher at 57,934, compared to 25,825 in Fort washington.
  • The median age in Fort washington is higher at 44.1 years, compared to 34.6 years in Brookhaven.
  • Fort washington has a higher median income of $143,623, compared to $114,570 in Brookhaven.
  • In Fort washington, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 36.0% in Brookhaven.
  • Brookhaven has a higher poverty level at 7% compared to 5% in Fort washington.
  • Fort washington has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.6% in Brookhaven.

Demographics

Demographics Brookhaven vs Fort washington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Brookhaven Fort washington
Black 12 61
White 53 8
Asian 7 8
Hispanic 17 17
Two or More Races 9 6
American Indian 2 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Brookhaven vs Fort washington

  • In Fort washington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 61% compared to 12% in Brookhaven.
  • Brookhaven has a higher percentage of White residents at 53% compared to 8% in Fort washington.
  • In Fort washington, the Asian population stands at 8%, greater than 7% in Brookhaven.
  • The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Brookhaven and Fort washington at 17%.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Brookhaven at 9% compared to 6% in Fort washington.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Brookhaven at 2% compared to 0% in Fort washington.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Brookhaven Fort washington
Mental Health Not Good 13.1% 12.5%
Physical Health Not Good 8.6% 7.9%
Depression 17.8% 11.6%
Smoking 10.0% 9.6%
Binge Drinking 16.2% 12.0%
Obesity 27.2% 37.7%
Disability Percentage 6.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Brookhaven vs Fort washington

  • More residents in Brookhaven report poor mental health at 13.1% compared to 12.5% in Fort washington.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Brookhaven at 17.8% compared to 11.6% in Fort washington.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Brookhaven at 10.0% compared to 9.6% in Fort washington.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Brookhaven at 16.2% compared to 12.0% in Fort washington.
  • Fort washington has higher obesity rates at 37.7% compared to 27.2% in Brookhaven.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fort washington at 9.0% compared to 6.0% in Brookhaven.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Brookhaven Fort washington
No Schooling 0.6% (341) 1.2% (297)
High School Diploma 5.1% (2,980) 14.4% (3,710)
Less than High School 8.0% (4,642) 8.3% (2,138)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 50.3% (29,125) 31.8% (8,208)

Education Levels Comparison: Brookhaven vs Fort washington

  • In Fort washington, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.6% in Brookhaven.
  • In Fort washington, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.4% compared to 5.1% in Brookhaven.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fort washington at 8.3%, compared to 8.0% in Brookhaven.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Brookhaven hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 50.3% compared to 31.8% in Fort washington.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.