Demographics details for Brookfield, WI vs Anamosa, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Brookfield, WI vs Anamosa, IA.
| Data | Brookfield | Anamosa |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 41,958 | 5,521 |
| Median Age | 43.8 years | 42.0 years |
| Median Income | $121,837 | $55,934 |
| Married Families | 51.0% | 30.0% |
| Poverty Level | 4% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.3 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Brookfield vs Anamosa
- In Brookfield, the population is higher at 41,958, compared to 5,521 in Anamosa.
- Residents in Brookfield have a higher median age of 43.8 years compared to 42.0 years in Anamosa.
- Brookfield has a higher median income of $121,837 compared to $55,934 in Anamosa.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Brookfield at 51.0% compared to 30.0% in Anamosa.
- The poverty level is higher in Anamosa at 8%, compared to 4% in Brookfield.
- Anamosa has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.3% in Brookfield.
Demographics
Demographics Brookfield vs Anamosa provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Brookfield | Anamosa |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 6 |
| White | 79 | 87 |
| Asian | 11 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Brookfield vs Anamosa
- In Anamosa, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 1% in Brookfield.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Anamosa at 87% compared to 79% in Brookfield.
- The Asian population is larger in Brookfield at 11% compared to 2% in Anamosa.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Brookfield at 3% compared to 2% in Anamosa.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Brookfield at 6% compared to 3% in Anamosa.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Brookfield and Anamosa at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Brookfield | Anamosa |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 11.7% | 16.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 6.9% | 11.1% |
| Depression | 19.0% | 18.7% |
| Smoking | 9.8% | 21.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 24.7% | 21.0% |
| Obesity | 31.5% | 45.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Brookfield vs Anamosa
- In Anamosa, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.0% compared to 11.7% in Brookfield.
- Depression is more prevalent in Brookfield at 19.0% compared to 18.7% in Anamosa.
- Anamosa has a higher smoking rate at 21.1% compared to 9.8% in Brookfield.
- Binge drinking is more common in Brookfield at 24.7% compared to 21.0% in Anamosa.
- Anamosa has higher obesity rates at 45.0% compared to 31.5% in Brookfield.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Anamosa at 14.0% compared to 8.0% in Brookfield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Brookfield | Anamosa |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (102) | 0.2% (13) |
| High School Diploma | 8.5% (3,547) | 22.3% (1,229) |
| Less than High School | 2.9% (1,215) | 10.5% (581) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 43.3% (18,147) | 13.5% (747) |
Education Levels Comparison: Brookfield vs Anamosa
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Brookfield and Anamosa at 0.2%.
- In Anamosa, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.3% compared to 8.5% in Brookfield.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Anamosa at 10.5%, compared to 2.9% in Brookfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Brookfield hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 43.3% compared to 13.5% in Anamosa.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.