Demographics details for Broken bow, NE vs Stearns, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Broken bow, NE vs Stearns, KY.
| Data | Broken bow | Stearns |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,474 | 1,224 |
| Median Age | 41.4 years | 48.0 years |
| Median Income | $49,425 | $38,333 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 52.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Broken bow vs Stearns
- In Broken bow, the population is higher at 3,474, compared to 1,224 in Stearns.
- The median age in Stearns is higher at 48.0 years, compared to 41.4 years in Broken bow.
- Broken bow has a higher median income of $49,425 compared to $38,333 in Stearns.
- In Stearns, the percentage of married families is higher at 52.0%, compared to 40.0% in Broken bow.
- The poverty level is higher in Stearns at 12%, compared to 11% in Broken bow.
- Stearns has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 2.5% in Broken bow.
Demographics
Demographics Broken bow vs Stearns provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Broken bow | Stearns |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | Data is updating |
| White | 88 | 99 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 6 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Broken bow vs Stearns
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Broken bow at 2% compared to 0% in Stearns.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Stearns at 99% compared to 88% in Broken bow.
- Both Broken bow and Stearns have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Broken bow at 6% compared to 0% in Stearns.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Broken bow at 4% compared to 1% in Stearns.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Broken bow and Stearns at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Broken bow | Stearns |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.2% | 23.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.0% | 19.0% |
| Depression | 17.1% | 32.6% |
| Smoking | 16.3% | 30.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.7% | 13.4% |
| Obesity | 38.2% | 43.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Broken bow vs Stearns
- In Stearns, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 23.5% compared to 14.2% in Broken bow.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Stearns at 32.6% versus 17.1% in Broken bow.
- Stearns has a higher smoking rate at 30.8% compared to 16.3% in Broken bow.
- Binge drinking is more common in Broken bow at 20.7% compared to 13.4% in Stearns.
- Stearns has higher obesity rates at 43.4% compared to 38.2% in Broken bow.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Stearns at 20.0% compared to 19.0% in Broken bow.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Broken bow | Stearns |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (42) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 19.8% (689) | 21.6% (264) |
| Less than High School | 7.3% (253) | 20.1% (246) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.7% (512) | 17.5% (214) |
Education Levels Comparison: Broken bow vs Stearns
- A higher percentage of residents in Broken bow have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.0% in Stearns.
- In Stearns, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.6% compared to 19.8% in Broken bow.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Stearns at 20.1%, compared to 7.3% in Broken bow.
- In Stearns, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.5% compared to 14.7% in Broken bow.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.