Demographics details for Broken bow, NE vs Montour, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Broken bow, NE vs Montour, IA.
| Data | Broken bow | Montour |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,474 | 199 |
| Median Age | 41.4 years | 49.8 years |
| Median Income | $49,425 | $73,750 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 55.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Broken bow vs Montour
- In Broken bow, the population is higher at 3,474, compared to 199 in Montour.
- The median age in Montour is higher at 49.8 years, compared to 41.4 years in Broken bow.
- Montour has a higher median income of $73,750, compared to $49,425 in Broken bow.
- In Montour, the percentage of married families is higher at 55.0%, compared to 40.0% in Broken bow.
- Broken bow has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 5% in Montour.
- Montour has a higher unemployment rate at 3.1% compared to 2.5% in Broken bow.
Demographics
Demographics Broken bow vs Montour provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Broken bow | Montour |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 4 |
| White | 88 | 76 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 6 | 11 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Broken bow vs Montour
- In Montour, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 2% in Broken bow.
- Broken bow has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 76% in Montour.
- Both Broken bow and Montour have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Montour has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 11%, compared to 6% in Broken bow.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Montour at 6%, compared to 4% in Broken bow.
- In Montour, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Broken bow.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Broken bow | Montour |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.2% | 16.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.0% | 10.9% |
| Depression | 17.1% | 19.5% |
| Smoking | 16.3% | 19.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.7% | 21.3% |
| Obesity | 38.2% | 42.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Broken bow vs Montour
- In Montour, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.5% compared to 14.2% in Broken bow.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Montour at 19.5% versus 17.1% in Broken bow.
- Montour has a higher smoking rate at 19.8% compared to 16.3% in Broken bow.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Montour at 21.3% compared to 20.7% in Broken bow.
- Montour has higher obesity rates at 42.6% compared to 38.2% in Broken bow.
- Disability percentages are higher in Broken bow at 19.0% compared to 14.0% in Montour.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Broken bow | Montour |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (42) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 19.8% (689) | 29.1% (58) |
| Less than High School | 7.3% (253) | 25.1% (50) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.7% (512) | 15.6% (31) |
Education Levels Comparison: Broken bow vs Montour
- A higher percentage of residents in Broken bow have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.0% in Montour.
- In Montour, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 29.1% compared to 19.8% in Broken bow.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Montour at 25.1%, compared to 7.3% in Broken bow.
- In Montour, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.6% compared to 14.7% in Broken bow.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.