Demographics details for Broken bow, NE vs Edgewater, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Broken bow, NE vs Edgewater, FL.
| Data | Broken bow | Edgewater |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,474 | 23,506 |
| Median Age | 41.4 years | 54.7 years |
| Median Income | $49,425 | $56,886 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Broken bow vs Edgewater
- The population in Edgewater is higher at 23,506, compared to 3,474 in Broken bow.
- The median age in Edgewater is higher at 54.7 years, compared to 41.4 years in Broken bow.
- Edgewater has a higher median income of $56,886, compared to $49,425 in Broken bow.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Broken bow and Edgewater at 40.0%.
- Broken bow has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 10% in Edgewater.
- Edgewater has a higher unemployment rate at 3.2% compared to 2.5% in Broken bow.
Demographics
Demographics Broken bow vs Edgewater provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Broken bow | Edgewater |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 2 |
| White | 88 | 87 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Broken bow vs Edgewater
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Broken bow and Edgewater at 2%.
- Broken bow has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 87% in Edgewater.
- In Edgewater, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Broken bow.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Broken bow and Edgewater at 6%.
- Both Broken bow and Edgewater have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 4%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Broken bow and Edgewater at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Broken bow | Edgewater |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.2% | 17.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.0% | 11.8% |
| Depression | 17.1% | 22.6% |
| Smoking | 16.3% | 23.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.7% | 18.8% |
| Obesity | 38.2% | 32.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Broken bow vs Edgewater
- In Edgewater, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 14.2% in Broken bow.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Edgewater at 22.6% versus 17.1% in Broken bow.
- Edgewater has a higher smoking rate at 23.5% compared to 16.3% in Broken bow.
- Binge drinking is more common in Broken bow at 20.7% compared to 18.8% in Edgewater.
- Obesity rates are higher in Broken bow at 38.2% compared to 32.9% in Edgewater.
- Disability percentages are higher in Broken bow at 19.0% compared to 18.0% in Edgewater.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Broken bow | Edgewater |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (42) | 0.3% (61) |
| High School Diploma | 19.8% (689) | 21.5% (5,056) |
| Less than High School | 7.3% (253) | 11.0% (2,583) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.7% (512) | 16.4% (3,859) |
Education Levels Comparison: Broken bow vs Edgewater
- A higher percentage of residents in Broken bow have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.3% in Edgewater.
- In Edgewater, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.5% compared to 19.8% in Broken bow.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Edgewater at 11.0%, compared to 7.3% in Broken bow.
- In Edgewater, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.4% compared to 14.7% in Broken bow.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.