Demographics details for Broken bow, NE vs Deshler, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Broken bow, NE vs Deshler, OH.
| Data | Broken bow | Deshler |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,474 | 1,571 |
| Median Age | 41.4 years | 36.7 years |
| Median Income | $49,425 | $57,273 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Broken bow vs Deshler
- In Broken bow, the population is higher at 3,474, compared to 1,571 in Deshler.
- Residents in Broken bow have a higher median age of 41.4 years compared to 36.7 years in Deshler.
- Deshler has a higher median income of $57,273, compared to $49,425 in Broken bow.
- In Deshler, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 40.0% in Broken bow.
- Broken bow has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 10% in Deshler.
- Deshler has a higher unemployment rate at 4.1% compared to 2.5% in Broken bow.
Demographics
Demographics Broken bow vs Deshler provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Broken bow | Deshler |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | Data is updating |
| White | 88 | 84 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 6 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Broken bow vs Deshler
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Broken bow at 2% compared to 0% in Deshler.
- Broken bow has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 84% in Deshler.
- Both Broken bow and Deshler have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Deshler has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 6% in Broken bow.
- Both Broken bow and Deshler have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 4%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Broken bow and Deshler at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Broken bow | Deshler |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.2% | 17.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.0% | 11.9% |
| Depression | 17.1% | 23.3% |
| Smoking | 16.3% | 20.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.7% | 18.9% |
| Obesity | 38.2% | 42.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Broken bow vs Deshler
- In Deshler, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 14.2% in Broken bow.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Deshler at 23.3% versus 17.1% in Broken bow.
- Deshler has a higher smoking rate at 20.5% compared to 16.3% in Broken bow.
- Binge drinking is more common in Broken bow at 20.7% compared to 18.9% in Deshler.
- Deshler has higher obesity rates at 42.3% compared to 38.2% in Broken bow.
- Disability percentages are higher in Broken bow at 19.0% compared to 10.0% in Deshler.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Broken bow | Deshler |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (42) | 3.1% (49) |
| High School Diploma | 19.8% (689) | 27.5% (432) |
| Less than High School | 7.3% (253) | 19.6% (308) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.7% (512) | 11.5% (180) |
Education Levels Comparison: Broken bow vs Deshler
- In Deshler, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.1% compared to 1.2% in Broken bow.
- In Deshler, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.5% compared to 19.8% in Broken bow.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Deshler at 19.6%, compared to 7.3% in Broken bow.
- A higher percentage of residents in Broken bow hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.7% compared to 11.5% in Deshler.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.