Demographics details for Broken arrow, OK vs Woodville, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Broken arrow, OK vs Woodville, MS.
Data | Broken arrow | Woodville |
---|---|---|
Population | 117,911 | 869 |
Median Age | 36.8 years | 49.5 years |
Median Income | $82,547 | $44,844 |
Married Families | 43.0% | 38.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 23% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.3 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Broken arrow vs Woodville
- In Broken arrow, the population is higher at 117,911, compared to 869 in Woodville.
- The median age in Woodville is higher at 49.5 years, compared to 36.8 years in Broken arrow.
- Broken arrow has a higher median income of $82,547 compared to $44,844 in Woodville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Broken arrow at 43.0% compared to 38.0% in Woodville.
- The poverty level is higher in Woodville at 23%, compared to 10% in Broken arrow.
- Woodville has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 3.3% in Broken arrow.
Demographics
Demographics Broken arrow vs Woodville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Broken arrow | Woodville |
---|---|---|
Black | 5 | 93 |
White | 65 | -2 |
Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 10 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 4 |
American Indian | 5 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Broken arrow vs Woodville
- In Woodville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 93% compared to 5% in Broken arrow.
- Broken arrow has a higher percentage of White residents at 65% compared to -2% in Woodville.
- The Asian population is larger in Broken arrow at 4% compared to 0% in Woodville.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Broken arrow at 10% compared to 5% in Woodville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Broken arrow at 11% compared to 4% in Woodville.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Broken arrow at 5% compared to 0% in Woodville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Broken arrow | Woodville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 19.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.3% | 16.1% |
Depression | 25.0% | 21.1% |
Smoking | 14.9% | 26.4% |
Binge Drinking | 15.0% | 11.0% |
Obesity | 34.6% | 46.0% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 33.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Broken arrow vs Woodville
- In Woodville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 16.8% in Broken arrow.
- Depression is more prevalent in Broken arrow at 25.0% compared to 21.1% in Woodville.
- Woodville has a higher smoking rate at 26.4% compared to 14.9% in Broken arrow.
- Binge drinking is more common in Broken arrow at 15.0% compared to 11.0% in Woodville.
- Woodville has higher obesity rates at 46.0% compared to 34.6% in Broken arrow.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Woodville at 33.0% compared to 11.0% in Broken arrow.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Broken arrow | Woodville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.8% (935) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 13.2% (15,535) | 36.8% (320) |
Less than High School | 6.6% (7,783) | 10.5% (91) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.2% (26,196) | 15.1% (131) |
Education Levels Comparison: Broken arrow vs Woodville
- A higher percentage of residents in Broken arrow have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.0% in Woodville.
- In Woodville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 36.8% compared to 13.2% in Broken arrow.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Woodville at 10.5%, compared to 6.6% in Broken arrow.
- A higher percentage of residents in Broken arrow hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.2% compared to 15.1% in Woodville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.