Demographics details for Broken arrow, OK vs Vancouver, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Broken arrow, OK vs Vancouver, WA.
Data | Broken arrow | Vancouver |
---|---|---|
Population | 117,911 | 194,512 |
Median Age | 36.8 years | 37.4 years |
Median Income | $82,547 | $73,626 |
Married Families | 43.0% | 36.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.3 | 4.6 |
Population Comparison: Broken arrow vs Vancouver
- The population in Vancouver is higher at 194,512, compared to 117,911 in Broken arrow.
- The median age in Vancouver is higher at 37.4 years, compared to 36.8 years in Broken arrow.
- Broken arrow has a higher median income of $82,547 compared to $73,626 in Vancouver.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Broken arrow at 43.0% compared to 36.0% in Vancouver.
- The poverty level is identical in both Broken arrow and Vancouver at 10%.
- Vancouver has a higher unemployment rate at 4.6% compared to 3.3% in Broken arrow.
Demographics
Demographics Broken arrow vs Vancouver provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Broken arrow | Vancouver |
---|---|---|
Black | 5 | 3 |
White | 65 | 65 |
Asian | 4 | 5 |
Hispanic | 10 | 15 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 11 |
American Indian | 5 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Broken arrow vs Vancouver
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Broken arrow at 5% compared to 3% in Vancouver.
- The percentage of White residents is the same in both Broken arrow and Vancouver at 65%.
- In Vancouver, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 4% in Broken arrow.
- Vancouver has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 15%, compared to 10% in Broken arrow.
- Both Broken arrow and Vancouver have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 11%.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Broken arrow at 5% compared to 1% in Vancouver.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Broken arrow | Vancouver |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 17.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.3% | 11.5% |
Depression | 25.0% | 25.7% |
Smoking | 14.9% | 14.5% |
Binge Drinking | 15.0% | 17.7% |
Obesity | 34.6% | 33.1% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Broken arrow vs Vancouver
- In Vancouver, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 16.8% in Broken arrow.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Vancouver at 25.7% versus 25.0% in Broken arrow.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Broken arrow at 14.9% compared to 14.5% in Vancouver.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Vancouver at 17.7% compared to 15.0% in Broken arrow.
- Obesity rates are higher in Broken arrow at 34.6% compared to 33.1% in Vancouver.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Vancouver at 14.0% compared to 11.0% in Broken arrow.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Broken arrow | Vancouver |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.8% (935) | 0.8% (1,478) |
High School Diploma | 13.2% (15,535) | 13.9% (26,995) |
Less than High School | 6.6% (7,783) | 10.7% (20,890) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.2% (26,196) | 21.2% (41,308) |
Education Levels Comparison: Broken arrow vs Vancouver
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Broken arrow and Vancouver at 0.8%.
- In Vancouver, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.9% compared to 13.2% in Broken arrow.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Vancouver at 10.7%, compared to 6.6% in Broken arrow.
- A higher percentage of residents in Broken arrow hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.2% compared to 21.2% in Vancouver.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.