Demographics details for Broken arrow, OK vs Santa clarita, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Broken arrow, OK vs Santa clarita, CA.

Data Broken arrow Santa clarita
Population 117,911 221,345
Median Age 36.8 years 37.3 years
Median Income $82,547 $116,186
Married Families 43.0% 43.0%
Poverty Level 10% 8%
Unemployment Rate 3.3 5.7

Population Comparison: Broken arrow vs Santa clarita

  • The population in Santa clarita is higher at 221,345, compared to 117,911 in Broken arrow.
  • The median age in Santa clarita is higher at 37.3 years, compared to 36.8 years in Broken arrow.
  • Santa clarita has a higher median income of $116,186, compared to $82,547 in Broken arrow.
  • The percentage of married families is the same in both Broken arrow and Santa clarita at 43.0%.
  • Broken arrow has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 8% in Santa clarita.
  • Santa clarita has a higher unemployment rate at 5.7% compared to 3.3% in Broken arrow.

Demographics

Demographics Broken arrow vs Santa clarita provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Broken arrow Santa clarita
Black 5 4
White 65 30
Asian 4 11
Hispanic 10 37
Two or More Races 11 17
American Indian 5 1

Demographics Comparison: Broken arrow vs Santa clarita

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Broken arrow at 5% compared to 4% in Santa clarita.
  • Broken arrow has a higher percentage of White residents at 65% compared to 30% in Santa clarita.
  • In Santa clarita, the Asian population stands at 11%, greater than 4% in Broken arrow.
  • Santa clarita has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 37%, compared to 10% in Broken arrow.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Santa clarita at 17%, compared to 11% in Broken arrow.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Broken arrow at 5% compared to 1% in Santa clarita.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Broken arrow Santa clarita
Mental Health Not Good 16.8% 14.7%
Physical Health Not Good 10.3% 9.6%
Depression 25.0% 16.8%
Smoking 14.9% 9.7%
Binge Drinking 15.0% 17.1%
Obesity 34.6% 26.2%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Broken arrow vs Santa clarita

  • More residents in Broken arrow report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 14.7% in Santa clarita.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Broken arrow at 25.0% compared to 16.8% in Santa clarita.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Broken arrow at 14.9% compared to 9.7% in Santa clarita.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Santa clarita at 17.1% compared to 15.0% in Broken arrow.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Broken arrow at 34.6% compared to 26.2% in Santa clarita.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Broken arrow at 11.0% compared to 10.0% in Santa clarita.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Broken arrow Santa clarita
No Schooling 0.8% (935) 1.4% (3,097)
High School Diploma 13.2% (15,535) 10.7% (23,725)
Less than High School 6.6% (7,783) 11.7% (25,882)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 22.2% (26,196) 26.1% (57,684)

Education Levels Comparison: Broken arrow vs Santa clarita

  • In Santa clarita, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.8% in Broken arrow.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Broken arrow hold a high school diploma at 13.2% compared to 10.7% in Santa clarita.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Santa clarita at 11.7%, compared to 6.6% in Broken arrow.
  • In Santa clarita, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.1% compared to 22.2% in Broken arrow.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.