Demographics details for Broken arrow, OK vs New bedford, MA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Broken arrow, OK vs New bedford, MA.

Data Broken arrow New bedford
Population 117,911 100,682
Median Age 36.8 years 36.8 years
Median Income $82,547 $54,604
Married Families 43.0% 29.0%
Poverty Level 10% 15%
Unemployment Rate 3.3 5.5

Population Comparison: Broken arrow vs New bedford

  • In Broken arrow, the population is higher at 117,911, compared to 100,682 in New bedford.
  • The median age is the same in both Broken arrow and New bedford at 36.8 years.
  • Broken arrow has a higher median income of $82,547 compared to $54,604 in New bedford.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Broken arrow at 43.0% compared to 29.0% in New bedford.
  • The poverty level is higher in New bedford at 15%, compared to 10% in Broken arrow.
  • New bedford has a higher unemployment rate at 5.5% compared to 3.3% in Broken arrow.

Demographics

Demographics Broken arrow vs New bedford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Broken arrow New bedford
Black 5 5
White 65 56
Asian 4 1
Hispanic 10 23
Two or More Races 11 14
American Indian 5 1

Demographics Comparison: Broken arrow vs New bedford

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Broken arrow and New bedford at 5%.
  • Broken arrow has a higher percentage of White residents at 65% compared to 56% in New bedford.
  • The Asian population is larger in Broken arrow at 4% compared to 1% in New bedford.
  • New bedford has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 23%, compared to 10% in Broken arrow.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in New bedford at 14%, compared to 11% in Broken arrow.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Broken arrow at 5% compared to 1% in New bedford.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Broken arrow New bedford
Mental Health Not Good 16.8% 19.4%
Physical Health Not Good 10.3% 13.4%
Depression 25.0% 24.2%
Smoking 14.9% 22.3%
Binge Drinking 15.0% 16.4%
Obesity 34.6% 33.6%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Broken arrow vs New bedford

  • In New bedford, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 16.8% in Broken arrow.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Broken arrow at 25.0% compared to 24.2% in New bedford.
  • New bedford has a higher smoking rate at 22.3% compared to 14.9% in Broken arrow.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in New bedford at 16.4% compared to 15.0% in Broken arrow.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Broken arrow at 34.6% compared to 33.6% in New bedford.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in New bedford at 14.0% compared to 11.0% in Broken arrow.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Broken arrow New bedford
No Schooling 0.8% (935) 2.7% (2,746)
High School Diploma 13.2% (15,535) 19.3% (19,436)
Less than High School 6.6% (7,783) 28.8% (29,037)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 22.2% (26,196) 10.9% (11,005)

Education Levels Comparison: Broken arrow vs New bedford

  • In New bedford, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.8% in Broken arrow.
  • In New bedford, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.3% compared to 13.2% in Broken arrow.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in New bedford at 28.8%, compared to 6.6% in Broken arrow.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Broken arrow hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.2% compared to 10.9% in New bedford.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.