Demographics details for Broken arrow, OK vs Chalfont, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Broken arrow, OK vs Chalfont, PA.
Data | Broken arrow | Chalfont |
---|---|---|
Population | 117,911 | 4,283 |
Median Age | 36.8 years | 41.7 years |
Median Income | $82,547 | $118,871 |
Married Families | 43.0% | 40.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 2% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.3 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Broken arrow vs Chalfont
- In Broken arrow, the population is higher at 117,911, compared to 4,283 in Chalfont.
- The median age in Chalfont is higher at 41.7 years, compared to 36.8 years in Broken arrow.
- Chalfont has a higher median income of $118,871, compared to $82,547 in Broken arrow.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Broken arrow at 43.0% compared to 40.0% in Chalfont.
- Broken arrow has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 2% in Chalfont.
- Chalfont has a higher unemployment rate at 3.4% compared to 3.3% in Broken arrow.
Demographics
Demographics Broken arrow vs Chalfont provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Broken arrow | Chalfont |
---|---|---|
Black | 5 | Data is updating |
White | 65 | 88 |
Asian | 4 | 4 |
Hispanic | 10 | 4 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 4 |
American Indian | 5 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Broken arrow vs Chalfont
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Broken arrow at 5% compared to 0% in Chalfont.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Chalfont at 88% compared to 65% in Broken arrow.
- Both Broken arrow and Chalfont have the same percentage of Asian residents at 4%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Broken arrow at 10% compared to 4% in Chalfont.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Broken arrow at 11% compared to 4% in Chalfont.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Broken arrow at 5% compared to 0% in Chalfont.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Broken arrow | Chalfont |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 13.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.3% | 7.8% |
Depression | 25.0% | 22.1% |
Smoking | 14.9% | 12.6% |
Binge Drinking | 15.0% | 20.5% |
Obesity | 34.6% | 29.5% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Broken arrow vs Chalfont
- More residents in Broken arrow report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 13.8% in Chalfont.
- Depression is more prevalent in Broken arrow at 25.0% compared to 22.1% in Chalfont.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Broken arrow at 14.9% compared to 12.6% in Chalfont.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Chalfont at 20.5% compared to 15.0% in Broken arrow.
- Obesity rates are higher in Broken arrow at 34.6% compared to 29.5% in Chalfont.
- Disability percentages are higher in Broken arrow at 11.0% compared to 7.0% in Chalfont.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Broken arrow | Chalfont |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.8% (935) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 13.2% (15,535) | 11.2% (479) |
Less than High School | 6.6% (7,783) | 2.3% (98) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.2% (26,196) | 42.7% (1,830) |
Education Levels Comparison: Broken arrow vs Chalfont
- A higher percentage of residents in Broken arrow have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.0% in Chalfont.
- A higher percentage of residents in Broken arrow hold a high school diploma at 13.2% compared to 11.2% in Chalfont.
- More residents in Broken arrow have less than a high school education at 6.6% compared to 2.3% in Chalfont.
- In Chalfont, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.7% compared to 22.2% in Broken arrow.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.