Demographics details for Brockton, MA vs Shelbyville, IN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Brockton, MA vs Shelbyville, IN.
Data | Brockton | Shelbyville |
---|---|---|
Population | 104,826 | 20,159 |
Median Age | 36.4 years | 35.6 years |
Median Income | $74,016 | $55,850 |
Married Families | 30.0% | 38.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | 8% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.3 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Brockton vs Shelbyville
- In Brockton, the population is higher at 104,826, compared to 20,159 in Shelbyville.
- Residents in Brockton have a higher median age of 36.4 years compared to 35.6 years in Shelbyville.
- Brockton has a higher median income of $74,016 compared to $55,850 in Shelbyville.
- In Shelbyville, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 30.0% in Brockton.
- The poverty level is identical in both Brockton and Shelbyville at 8%.
- The unemployment rate in Brockton is higher at 5.3%, compared to 3.2% in Shelbyville.
Demographics
Demographics Brockton vs Shelbyville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Brockton | Shelbyville |
---|---|---|
Black | 40 | 3 |
White | 30 | 83 |
Asian | 2 | 2 |
Hispanic | 12 | 9 |
Two or More Races | 16 | 3 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Brockton vs Shelbyville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Brockton at 40% compared to 3% in Shelbyville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Shelbyville at 83% compared to 30% in Brockton.
- Both Brockton and Shelbyville have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Brockton at 12% compared to 9% in Shelbyville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Brockton at 16% compared to 3% in Shelbyville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Brockton and Shelbyville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Brockton | Shelbyville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.4% | 18.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 12.6% |
Depression | 22.1% | 26.8% |
Smoking | 19.7% | 21.7% |
Binge Drinking | 16.0% | 16.4% |
Obesity | 33.7% | 41.5% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Brockton vs Shelbyville
- More residents in Brockton report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 18.1% in Shelbyville.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Shelbyville at 26.8% versus 22.1% in Brockton.
- Shelbyville has a higher smoking rate at 21.7% compared to 19.7% in Brockton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Shelbyville at 16.4% compared to 16.0% in Brockton.
- Shelbyville has higher obesity rates at 41.5% compared to 33.7% in Brockton.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Shelbyville at 15.0% compared to 13.0% in Brockton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Brockton | Shelbyville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.9% (3,088) | 1.1% (212) |
High School Diploma | 19.7% (20,641) | 24.9% (5,016) |
Less than High School | 15.5% (16,291) | 17.0% (3,430) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.4% (14,056) | 11.8% (2,384) |
Education Levels Comparison: Brockton vs Shelbyville
- A higher percentage of residents in Brockton have no formal schooling at 2.9% compared to 1.1% in Shelbyville.
- In Shelbyville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.9% compared to 19.7% in Brockton.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Shelbyville at 17.0%, compared to 15.5% in Brockton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Brockton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.4% compared to 11.8% in Shelbyville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.