Demographics details for Brockton, MA vs San jose, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Brockton, MA vs San jose, CA.
| Data | Brockton | San jose |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 104,826 | 971,233 |
| Median Age | 36.4 years | 37.8 years |
| Median Income | $74,016 | $136,010 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.3 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Brockton vs San jose
- The population in San jose is higher at 971,233, compared to 104,826 in Brockton.
- The median age in San jose is higher at 37.8 years, compared to 36.4 years in Brockton.
- San jose has a higher median income of $136,010, compared to $74,016 in Brockton.
- In San jose, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 30.0% in Brockton.
- The poverty level is higher in San jose at 11%, compared to 8% in Brockton.
- The unemployment rate in Brockton is higher at 5.3%, compared to 4.2% in San jose.
Demographics
Demographics Brockton vs San jose provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Brockton | San jose |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 40 | 3 |
| White | 30 | 12 |
| Asian | 2 | 39 |
| Hispanic | 12 | 32 |
| Two or More Races | 16 | 13 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Brockton vs San jose
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Brockton at 40% compared to 3% in San jose.
- Brockton has a higher percentage of White residents at 30% compared to 12% in San jose.
- In San jose, the Asian population stands at 39%, greater than 2% in Brockton.
- San jose has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 32%, compared to 12% in Brockton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Brockton at 16% compared to 13% in San jose.
- In San jose, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Brockton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Brockton | San jose |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.4% | 13.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 8.7% |
| Depression | 22.1% | 14.7% |
| Smoking | 19.7% | 8.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.0% | 13.8% |
| Obesity | 33.7% | 20.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Brockton vs San jose
- More residents in Brockton report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 13.1% in San jose.
- Depression is more prevalent in Brockton at 22.1% compared to 14.7% in San jose.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Brockton at 19.7% compared to 8.7% in San jose.
- Binge drinking is more common in Brockton at 16.0% compared to 13.8% in San jose.
- Obesity rates are higher in Brockton at 33.7% compared to 20.6% in San jose.
- Disability percentages are higher in Brockton at 13.0% compared to 9.0% in San jose.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Brockton | San jose |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.9% (3,088) | 2.7% (26,673) |
| High School Diploma | 19.7% (20,641) | 10.3% (100,469) |
| Less than High School | 15.5% (16,291) | 17.0% (165,241) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.4% (14,056) | 33.0% (320,589) |
Education Levels Comparison: Brockton vs San jose
- A higher percentage of residents in Brockton have no formal schooling at 2.9% compared to 2.7% in San jose.
- A higher percentage of residents in Brockton hold a high school diploma at 19.7% compared to 10.3% in San jose.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in San jose at 17.0%, compared to 15.5% in Brockton.
- In San jose, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.0% compared to 13.4% in Brockton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.