Demographics details for Brockton, MA vs Perrysburg, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Brockton, MA vs Perrysburg, OH.
| Data | Brockton | Perrysburg |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 104,826 | 25,161 |
| Median Age | 36.4 years | 38.9 years |
| Median Income | $74,016 | $98,419 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.3 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Brockton vs Perrysburg
- In Brockton, the population is higher at 104,826, compared to 25,161 in Perrysburg.
- The median age in Perrysburg is higher at 38.9 years, compared to 36.4 years in Brockton.
- Perrysburg has a higher median income of $98,419, compared to $74,016 in Brockton.
- In Perrysburg, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 30.0% in Brockton.
- Brockton has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 6% in Perrysburg.
- The unemployment rate in Brockton is higher at 5.3%, compared to 4.2% in Perrysburg.
Demographics
Demographics Brockton vs Perrysburg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Brockton | Perrysburg |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 40 | 2 |
| White | 30 | 87 |
| Asian | 2 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 12 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 16 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Brockton vs Perrysburg
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Brockton at 40% compared to 2% in Perrysburg.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Perrysburg at 87% compared to 30% in Brockton.
- In Perrysburg, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 2% in Brockton.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Brockton at 12% compared to 4% in Perrysburg.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Brockton at 16% compared to 4% in Perrysburg.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Brockton and Perrysburg at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Brockton | Perrysburg |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.4% | 14.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 8.4% |
| Depression | 22.1% | 22.5% |
| Smoking | 19.7% | 12.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.0% | 19.0% |
| Obesity | 33.7% | 36.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Brockton vs Perrysburg
- More residents in Brockton report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 14.3% in Perrysburg.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Perrysburg at 22.5% versus 22.1% in Brockton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Brockton at 19.7% compared to 12.1% in Perrysburg.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Perrysburg at 19.0% compared to 16.0% in Brockton.
- Perrysburg has higher obesity rates at 36.6% compared to 33.7% in Brockton.
- Disability percentages are higher in Brockton at 13.0% compared to 10.0% in Perrysburg.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Brockton | Perrysburg |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.9% (3,088) | 0.2% (53) |
| High School Diploma | 19.7% (20,641) | 8.7% (2,192) |
| Less than High School | 15.5% (16,291) | 2.6% (645) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.4% (14,056) | 38.5% (9,689) |
Education Levels Comparison: Brockton vs Perrysburg
- A higher percentage of residents in Brockton have no formal schooling at 2.9% compared to 0.2% in Perrysburg.
- A higher percentage of residents in Brockton hold a high school diploma at 19.7% compared to 8.7% in Perrysburg.
- More residents in Brockton have less than a high school education at 15.5% compared to 2.6% in Perrysburg.
- In Perrysburg, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.5% compared to 13.4% in Brockton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.