Demographics details for Brockton, MA vs Central point, OR

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Brockton, MA vs Central point, OR.

Data Brockton Central point
Population 104,826 19,222
Median Age 36.4 years 40.3 years
Median Income $74,016 $79,731
Married Families 30.0% 45.0%
Poverty Level 8% 10%
Unemployment Rate 5.3 4.5

Population Comparison: Brockton vs Central point

  • In Brockton, the population is higher at 104,826, compared to 19,222 in Central point.
  • The median age in Central point is higher at 40.3 years, compared to 36.4 years in Brockton.
  • Central point has a higher median income of $79,731, compared to $74,016 in Brockton.
  • In Central point, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 30.0% in Brockton.
  • The poverty level is higher in Central point at 10%, compared to 8% in Brockton.
  • The unemployment rate in Brockton is higher at 5.3%, compared to 4.5% in Central point.

Demographics

Demographics Brockton vs Central point provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Brockton Central point
Black 40 Data is updating
White 30 76
Asian 2 1
Hispanic 12 15
Two or More Races 16 7
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Brockton vs Central point

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Brockton at 40% compared to 0% in Central point.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Central point at 76% compared to 30% in Brockton.
  • The Asian population is larger in Brockton at 2% compared to 1% in Central point.
  • Central point has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 15%, compared to 12% in Brockton.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Brockton at 16% compared to 7% in Central point.
  • In Central point, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Brockton.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Brockton Central point
Mental Health Not Good 18.4% 19.4%
Physical Health Not Good 12.0% 12.0%
Depression 22.1% 29.4%
Smoking 19.7% 16.7%
Binge Drinking 16.0% 16.5%
Obesity 33.7% 30.1%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Brockton vs Central point

  • In Central point, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 18.4% in Brockton.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Central point at 29.4% versus 22.1% in Brockton.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Brockton at 19.7% compared to 16.7% in Central point.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Central point at 16.5% compared to 16.0% in Brockton.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Brockton at 33.7% compared to 30.1% in Central point.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Brockton at 13.0% compared to 11.0% in Central point.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Brockton Central point
No Schooling 2.9% (3,088) 1.7% (319)
High School Diploma 19.7% (20,641) 16.1% (3,095)
Less than High School 15.5% (16,291) 13.2% (2,530)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 13.4% (14,056) 15.6% (3,003)

Education Levels Comparison: Brockton vs Central point

  • A higher percentage of residents in Brockton have no formal schooling at 2.9% compared to 1.7% in Central point.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Brockton hold a high school diploma at 19.7% compared to 16.1% in Central point.
  • More residents in Brockton have less than a high school education at 15.5% compared to 13.2% in Central point.
  • In Central point, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.6% compared to 13.4% in Brockton.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.