Demographics details for Broadview heights, OH vs Cochran, GA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Broadview heights, OH vs Cochran, GA.

Data Broadview heights Cochran
Population 19,635 4,647
Median Age 45.0 years 28.9 years
Median Income $97,902 $31,326
Married Families 47.0% 25.0%
Poverty Level 5% 19%
Unemployment Rate 4.0 3.2

Population Comparison: Broadview heights vs Cochran

  • In Broadview heights, the population is higher at 19,635, compared to 4,647 in Cochran.
  • Residents in Broadview heights have a higher median age of 45.0 years compared to 28.9 years in Cochran.
  • Broadview heights has a higher median income of $97,902 compared to $31,326 in Cochran.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Broadview heights at 47.0% compared to 25.0% in Cochran.
  • The poverty level is higher in Cochran at 19%, compared to 5% in Broadview heights.
  • The unemployment rate in Broadview heights is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.2% in Cochran.

Demographics

Demographics Broadview heights vs Cochran provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Broadview heights Cochran
Black 3 53
White 85 40
Asian 6 2
Hispanic 2 2
Two or More Races 4 3
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Broadview heights vs Cochran

  • In Cochran, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 53% compared to 3% in Broadview heights.
  • Broadview heights has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 40% in Cochran.
  • The Asian population is larger in Broadview heights at 6% compared to 2% in Cochran.
  • The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Broadview heights and Cochran at 2%.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Broadview heights at 4% compared to 3% in Cochran.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Broadview heights and Cochran at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Broadview heights Cochran
Mental Health Not Good 14.0% 18.3%
Physical Health Not Good 8.6% 13.7%
Depression 23.0% 21.8%
Smoking 12.8% 20.0%
Binge Drinking 20.7% 13.6%
Obesity 27.3% 38.5%
Disability Percentage 8.0% 16.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Broadview heights vs Cochran

  • In Cochran, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 14.0% in Broadview heights.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Broadview heights at 23.0% compared to 21.8% in Cochran.
  • Cochran has a higher smoking rate at 20.0% compared to 12.8% in Broadview heights.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Broadview heights at 20.7% compared to 13.6% in Cochran.
  • Cochran has higher obesity rates at 38.5% compared to 27.3% in Broadview heights.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cochran at 16.0% compared to 8.0% in Broadview heights.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Broadview heights Cochran
No Schooling 1.0% (191) 1.2% (54)
High School Diploma 10.9% (2,149) 12.2% (569)
Less than High School 3.8% (746) 15.1% (703)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 39.1% (7,676) 12.7% (592)

Education Levels Comparison: Broadview heights vs Cochran

  • In Cochran, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 1.0% in Broadview heights.
  • In Cochran, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.2% compared to 10.9% in Broadview heights.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cochran at 15.1%, compared to 3.8% in Broadview heights.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Broadview heights hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 39.1% compared to 12.7% in Cochran.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.