Demographics details for Broadview heights, OH vs Chapman, KS

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Broadview heights, OH vs Chapman, KS.

Data Broadview heights Chapman
Population 19,635 1,371
Median Age 45.0 years 41.4 years
Median Income $97,902 $66,964
Married Families 47.0% 33.0%
Poverty Level 5% 8%
Unemployment Rate 4.0 3.1

Population Comparison: Broadview heights vs Chapman

  • In Broadview heights, the population is higher at 19,635, compared to 1,371 in Chapman.
  • Residents in Broadview heights have a higher median age of 45.0 years compared to 41.4 years in Chapman.
  • Broadview heights has a higher median income of $97,902 compared to $66,964 in Chapman.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Broadview heights at 47.0% compared to 33.0% in Chapman.
  • The poverty level is higher in Chapman at 8%, compared to 5% in Broadview heights.
  • The unemployment rate in Broadview heights is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.1% in Chapman.

Demographics

Demographics Broadview heights vs Chapman provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Broadview heights Chapman
Black 3 Data is updating
White 85 81
Asian 6 3
Hispanic 2 7
Two or More Races 4 7
American Indian Data is updating 2

Demographics Comparison: Broadview heights vs Chapman

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Broadview heights at 3% compared to 0% in Chapman.
  • Broadview heights has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 81% in Chapman.
  • The Asian population is larger in Broadview heights at 6% compared to 3% in Chapman.
  • Chapman has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 2% in Broadview heights.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Chapman at 7%, compared to 4% in Broadview heights.
  • In Chapman, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Broadview heights.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Broadview heights Chapman
Mental Health Not Good 14.0% 15.7%
Physical Health Not Good 8.6% 9.5%
Depression 23.0% 21.4%
Smoking 12.8% 16.6%
Binge Drinking 20.7% 20.2%
Obesity 27.3% 37.3%
Disability Percentage 8.0% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Broadview heights vs Chapman

  • In Chapman, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.7% compared to 14.0% in Broadview heights.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Broadview heights at 23.0% compared to 21.4% in Chapman.
  • Chapman has a higher smoking rate at 16.6% compared to 12.8% in Broadview heights.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Broadview heights at 20.7% compared to 20.2% in Chapman.
  • Chapman has higher obesity rates at 37.3% compared to 27.3% in Broadview heights.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Chapman at 14.0% compared to 8.0% in Broadview heights.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Broadview heights Chapman
No Schooling 1.0% (191) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 10.9% (2,149) 12.3% (168)
Less than High School 3.8% (746) 5.1% (70)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 39.1% (7,676) 15.5% (212)

Education Levels Comparison: Broadview heights vs Chapman

  • A higher percentage of residents in Broadview heights have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.0% in Chapman.
  • In Chapman, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.3% compared to 10.9% in Broadview heights.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Chapman at 5.1%, compared to 3.8% in Broadview heights.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Broadview heights hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 39.1% compared to 15.5% in Chapman.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.