Demographics details for Broadalbin, NY vs Camas, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Broadalbin, NY vs Camas, WA.
| Data | Broadalbin | Camas |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 5,158 | 27,371 |
| Median Age | 40.0 years | 40.3 years |
| Median Income | $60,000 | $133,829 |
| Married Families | 49.0% | 49.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 4% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 4.7 |
Population Comparison: Broadalbin vs Camas
- The population in Camas is higher at 27,371, compared to 5,158 in Broadalbin.
- The median age in Camas is higher at 40.3 years, compared to 40.0 years in Broadalbin.
- Camas has a higher median income of $133,829, compared to $60,000 in Broadalbin.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Broadalbin and Camas at 49.0%.
- Broadalbin has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 4% in Camas.
- Camas has a higher unemployment rate at 4.7% compared to 4.0% in Broadalbin.
Demographics
Demographics Broadalbin vs Camas provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Broadalbin | Camas |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 2 |
| White | 95 | 73 |
| Asian | 1 | 10 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Broadalbin vs Camas
- In Camas, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Broadalbin.
- Broadalbin has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 73% in Camas.
- In Camas, the Asian population stands at 10%, greater than 1% in Broadalbin.
- Camas has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 2% in Broadalbin.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Camas at 9%, compared to 2% in Broadalbin.
- In Camas, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Broadalbin.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Broadalbin | Camas |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 14.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 8.7% |
| Depression | Data is updating% | 23.8% |
| Smoking | Data is updating% | 9.9% |
| Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 19.2% |
| Obesity | Data is updating% | 28.5% |
| Disability Percentage | Data is updating% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Broadalbin vs Camas
- In Camas, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 14.7% compared to 0.0% in Broadalbin.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Camas at 23.8% versus 0.0% in Broadalbin.
- Camas has a higher smoking rate at 9.9% compared to 0.0% in Broadalbin.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Camas at 19.2% compared to 0.0% in Broadalbin.
- Camas has higher obesity rates at 28.5% compared to 0.0% in Broadalbin.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Camas at 8.0% compared to 0.0% in Broadalbin.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Broadalbin | Camas |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.4% (110) |
| High School Diploma | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 9.9% (2,708) |
| Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 3.7% (1,021) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 33.5% (9,172) |
Education Levels Comparison: Broadalbin vs Camas
- In Camas, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Broadalbin.
- In Camas, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 9.9% compared to 0.0% in Broadalbin.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Camas at 3.7%, compared to 0.0% in Broadalbin.
- In Camas, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.5% compared to 0.0% in Broadalbin.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.