Demographics details for Broad brook, CT vs Gooding, ID
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Broad brook, CT vs Gooding, ID.
Data | Broad brook | Gooding |
---|---|---|
Population | 4,006 | 15,715 |
Median Age | 36.9 years | 38.3 years |
Median Income | $93,243 | $60,938 |
Married Families | 35.0% | 40.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 8% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 2.9 |
Population Comparison: Broad brook vs Gooding
- The population in Gooding is higher at 15,715, compared to 4,006 in Broad brook.
- The median age in Gooding is higher at 38.3 years, compared to 36.9 years in Broad brook.
- Broad brook has a higher median income of $93,243 compared to $60,938 in Gooding.
- In Gooding, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 35.0% in Broad brook.
- The poverty level is higher in Gooding at 8%, compared to 5% in Broad brook.
- The unemployment rate in Broad brook is higher at 4.2%, compared to 2.9% in Gooding.
Demographics
Demographics Broad brook vs Gooding provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Broad brook | Gooding |
---|---|---|
Black | 18 | Data is updating |
White | 58 | 60 |
Asian | 10 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 12 | 29 |
Two or More Races | 2 | 9 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Broad brook vs Gooding
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Broad brook at 18% compared to 0% in Gooding.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Gooding at 60% compared to 58% in Broad brook.
- The Asian population is larger in Broad brook at 10% compared to 0% in Gooding.
- Gooding has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 29%, compared to 12% in Broad brook.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Gooding at 9%, compared to 2% in Broad brook.
- In Gooding, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Broad brook.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Broad brook | Gooding |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 16.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.7% | 12.8% |
Depression | 24.8% | 22.7% |
Smoking | 14.2% | 18.0% |
Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 15.6% |
Obesity | 33.4% | 36.9% |
Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Broad brook vs Gooding
- More residents in Broad brook report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 16.4% in Gooding.
- Depression is more prevalent in Broad brook at 24.8% compared to 22.7% in Gooding.
- Gooding has a higher smoking rate at 18.0% compared to 14.2% in Broad brook.
- Binge drinking is more common in Broad brook at 15.9% compared to 15.6% in Gooding.
- Gooding has higher obesity rates at 36.9% compared to 33.4% in Broad brook.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Gooding at 15.0% compared to 7.0% in Broad brook.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Broad brook | Gooding |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.8% (113) | 0.8% (131) |
High School Diploma | 12.6% (504) | 19.5% (3,066) |
Less than High School | 5.8% (231) | 26.7% (4,203) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 30.7% (1,230) | 10.1% (1,588) |
Education Levels Comparison: Broad brook vs Gooding
- A higher percentage of residents in Broad brook have no formal schooling at 2.8% compared to 0.8% in Gooding.
- In Gooding, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.5% compared to 12.6% in Broad brook.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Gooding at 26.7%, compared to 5.8% in Broad brook.
- A higher percentage of residents in Broad brook hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.7% compared to 10.1% in Gooding.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.