Demographics details for Bristol, WI vs Chowchilla, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bristol, WI vs Chowchilla, CA.
Data | Bristol | Chowchilla |
---|---|---|
Population | 5,178 | 18,738 |
Median Age | 45.8 years | 34.1 years |
Median Income | $103,652 | $67,212 |
Married Families | 54.0% | 26.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | 19% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Bristol vs Chowchilla
- The population in Chowchilla is higher at 18,738, compared to 5,178 in Bristol.
- Residents in Bristol have a higher median age of 45.8 years compared to 34.1 years in Chowchilla.
- Bristol has a higher median income of $103,652 compared to $67,212 in Chowchilla.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Bristol at 54.0% compared to 26.0% in Chowchilla.
- The poverty level is higher in Chowchilla at 19%, compared to 8% in Bristol.
- Chowchilla has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 3.2% in Bristol.
Demographics
Demographics Bristol vs Chowchilla provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Bristol | Chowchilla |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 6 |
White | 95 | 29 |
Asian | Data is updating | 6 |
Hispanic | 3 | 48 |
Two or More Races | 2 | 9 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Bristol vs Chowchilla
- In Chowchilla, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 0% in Bristol.
- Bristol has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 29% in Chowchilla.
- In Chowchilla, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 0% in Bristol.
- Chowchilla has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 48%, compared to 3% in Bristol.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Chowchilla at 9%, compared to 2% in Bristol.
- In Chowchilla, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Bristol.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Bristol | Chowchilla |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.2% | 20.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.2% | 15.1% |
Depression | 22.4% | 23.3% |
Smoking | 11.9% | 18.3% |
Binge Drinking | 25.5% | 13.7% |
Obesity | 33.4% | 36.7% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bristol vs Chowchilla
- In Chowchilla, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.9% compared to 13.2% in Bristol.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Chowchilla at 23.3% versus 22.4% in Bristol.
- Chowchilla has a higher smoking rate at 18.3% compared to 11.9% in Bristol.
- Binge drinking is more common in Bristol at 25.5% compared to 13.7% in Chowchilla.
- Chowchilla has higher obesity rates at 36.7% compared to 33.4% in Bristol.
- Disability percentages are higher in Bristol at 12.0% compared to 7.0% in Chowchilla.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Bristol | Chowchilla |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (29) | 1.4% (271) |
High School Diploma | 14.1% (729) | 14.6% (2,738) |
Less than High School | 3.0% (156) | 31.2% (5,842) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.0% (1,141) | 9.2% (1,731) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bristol vs Chowchilla
- In Chowchilla, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.6% in Bristol.
- In Chowchilla, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.6% compared to 14.1% in Bristol.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Chowchilla at 31.2%, compared to 3.0% in Bristol.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bristol hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.0% compared to 9.2% in Chowchilla.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.