Demographics details for Bristol, TN vs Waterford, CT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bristol, TN vs Waterford, CT.
| Data | Bristol | Waterford |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 27,705 | 3,276 |
| Median Age | 40.2 years | 45.2 years |
| Median Income | $49,130 | $74,701 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Bristol vs Waterford
- In Bristol, the population is higher at 27,705, compared to 3,276 in Waterford.
- The median age in Waterford is higher at 45.2 years, compared to 40.2 years in Bristol.
- Waterford has a higher median income of $74,701, compared to $49,130 in Bristol.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Bristol at 37.0% compared to 34.0% in Waterford.
- Bristol has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 5% in Waterford.
- The unemployment rate in Bristol is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.7% in Waterford.
Demographics
Demographics Bristol vs Waterford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Bristol | Waterford |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 4 |
| White | 89 | 80 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 5 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Bristol vs Waterford
- In Waterford, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 3% in Bristol.
- Bristol has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 80% in Waterford.
- In Waterford, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 0% in Bristol.
- Waterford has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 3% in Bristol.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Waterford at 6%, compared to 5% in Bristol.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Bristol and Waterford at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Bristol | Waterford |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.5% | 16.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.0% | 10.4% |
| Depression | 31.0% | 24.0% |
| Smoking | 22.4% | 17.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.8% | 17.2% |
| Obesity | 37.2% | 32.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bristol vs Waterford
- More residents in Bristol report poor mental health at 20.5% compared to 16.7% in Waterford.
- Depression is more prevalent in Bristol at 31.0% compared to 24.0% in Waterford.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Bristol at 22.4% compared to 17.5% in Waterford.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Waterford at 17.2% compared to 13.8% in Bristol.
- Obesity rates are higher in Bristol at 37.2% compared to 32.3% in Waterford.
- Disability percentages are higher in Bristol at 18.0% compared to 17.0% in Waterford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Bristol | Waterford |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (171) | 0.5% (17) |
| High School Diploma | 16.3% (4,505) | 22.6% (739) |
| Less than High School | 10.0% (2,781) | 5.9% (193) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.2% (5,590) | 17.8% (582) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bristol vs Waterford
- A higher percentage of residents in Bristol have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.5% in Waterford.
- In Waterford, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.6% compared to 16.3% in Bristol.
- More residents in Bristol have less than a high school education at 10.0% compared to 5.9% in Waterford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bristol hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.2% compared to 17.8% in Waterford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.