Demographics details for Bristol, TN vs Wadesboro, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bristol, TN vs Wadesboro, NC.
Data | Bristol | Wadesboro |
---|---|---|
Population | 27,705 | 4,966 |
Median Age | 40.2 years | 38.3 years |
Median Income | $49,130 | $32,022 |
Married Families | 37.0% | 20.0% |
Poverty Level | 14% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Bristol vs Wadesboro
- In Bristol, the population is higher at 27,705, compared to 4,966 in Wadesboro.
- Residents in Bristol have a higher median age of 40.2 years compared to 38.3 years in Wadesboro.
- Bristol has a higher median income of $49,130 compared to $32,022 in Wadesboro.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Bristol at 37.0% compared to 20.0% in Wadesboro.
- Bristol has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 0% in Wadesboro.
- Wadesboro has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.2% in Bristol.
Demographics
Demographics Bristol vs Wadesboro provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Bristol | Wadesboro |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 70 |
White | 89 | 25 |
Asian | Data is updating | 5 |
Hispanic | 3 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 5 | Data is updating |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Bristol vs Wadesboro
- In Wadesboro, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 70% compared to 3% in Bristol.
- Bristol has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 25% in Wadesboro.
- In Wadesboro, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 0% in Bristol.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Bristol at 3% compared to 0% in Wadesboro.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Bristol at 5% compared to 0% in Wadesboro.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Bristol and Wadesboro at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Bristol | Wadesboro |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 20.5% | 18.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.0% | 13.7% |
Depression | 31.0% | 21.6% |
Smoking | 22.4% | 22.2% |
Binge Drinking | 13.8% | 13.9% |
Obesity | 37.2% | 44.3% |
Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bristol vs Wadesboro
- More residents in Bristol report poor mental health at 20.5% compared to 18.1% in Wadesboro.
- Depression is more prevalent in Bristol at 31.0% compared to 21.6% in Wadesboro.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Bristol at 22.4% compared to 22.2% in Wadesboro.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Wadesboro at 13.9% compared to 13.8% in Bristol.
- Wadesboro has higher obesity rates at 44.3% compared to 37.2% in Bristol.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Wadesboro at 20.0% compared to 18.0% in Bristol.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Bristol | Wadesboro |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (171) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 16.3% (4,505) | 19.2% (953) |
Less than High School | 10.0% (2,781) | 11.8% (587) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.2% (5,590) | 9.5% (472) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bristol vs Wadesboro
- A higher percentage of residents in Bristol have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Wadesboro.
- In Wadesboro, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.2% compared to 16.3% in Bristol.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Wadesboro at 11.8%, compared to 10.0% in Bristol.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bristol hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.2% compared to 9.5% in Wadesboro.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.