Demographics details for Bristol, TN vs Sterling, CT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bristol, TN vs Sterling, CT.
Data | Bristol | Sterling |
---|---|---|
Population | 27,705 | 3,830 |
Median Age | 40.2 years | 42.0 years |
Median Income | $49,130 | $85,000 |
Married Families | 37.0% | 80.0% |
Poverty Level | 14% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 2.9 |
Population Comparison: Bristol vs Sterling
- In Bristol, the population is higher at 27,705, compared to 3,830 in Sterling.
- The median age in Sterling is higher at 42.0 years, compared to 40.2 years in Bristol.
- Sterling has a higher median income of $85,000, compared to $49,130 in Bristol.
- In Sterling, the percentage of married families is higher at 80.0%, compared to 37.0% in Bristol.
- Bristol has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 5% in Sterling.
- The unemployment rate in Bristol is higher at 4.2%, compared to 2.9% in Sterling.
Demographics
Demographics Bristol vs Sterling provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Bristol | Sterling |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 2 |
White | 89 | 95 |
Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
Hispanic | 3 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 5 | Data is updating |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Bristol vs Sterling
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Bristol at 3% compared to 2% in Sterling.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Sterling at 95% compared to 89% in Bristol.
- In Sterling, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Bristol.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Bristol at 3% compared to 2% in Sterling.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Bristol at 5% compared to 0% in Sterling.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Bristol and Sterling at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Bristol | Sterling |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 20.5% | Data is updating% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.0% | Data is updating% |
Depression | 31.0% | Data is updating% |
Smoking | 22.4% | Data is updating% |
Binge Drinking | 13.8% | Data is updating% |
Obesity | 37.2% | Data is updating% |
Disability Percentage | 18.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bristol vs Sterling
- More residents in Bristol report poor mental health at 20.5% compared to 0.0% in Sterling.
- Depression is more prevalent in Bristol at 31.0% compared to 0.0% in Sterling.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Bristol at 22.4% compared to 0.0% in Sterling.
- Binge drinking is more common in Bristol at 13.8% compared to 0.0% in Sterling.
- Obesity rates are higher in Bristol at 37.2% compared to 0.0% in Sterling.
- Disability percentages are higher in Bristol at 18.0% compared to 0.0% in Sterling.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Bristol | Sterling |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (171) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 16.3% (4,505) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Less than High School | 10.0% (2,781) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.2% (5,590) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bristol vs Sterling
- A higher percentage of residents in Bristol have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Sterling.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bristol hold a high school diploma at 16.3% compared to 0.0% in Sterling.
- More residents in Bristol have less than a high school education at 10.0% compared to 0.0% in Sterling.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bristol hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.2% compared to 0.0% in Sterling.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.