Demographics details for Bristol, TN vs South jordan, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bristol, TN vs South jordan, UT.
Data | Bristol | South jordan |
---|---|---|
Population | 27,705 | 83,513 |
Median Age | 40.2 years | 34.4 years |
Median Income | $49,130 | $119,822 |
Married Families | 37.0% | 44.0% |
Poverty Level | 14% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Bristol vs South jordan
- The population in South jordan is higher at 83,513, compared to 27,705 in Bristol.
- Residents in Bristol have a higher median age of 40.2 years compared to 34.4 years in South jordan.
- South jordan has a higher median income of $119,822, compared to $49,130 in Bristol.
- In South jordan, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 37.0% in Bristol.
- Bristol has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 5% in South jordan.
- The unemployment rate in Bristol is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.7% in South jordan.
Demographics
Demographics Bristol vs South jordan provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Bristol | South jordan |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | Data is updating |
White | 89 | 83 |
Asian | Data is updating | 4 |
Hispanic | 3 | 7 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 5 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Bristol vs South jordan
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Bristol at 3% compared to 0% in South jordan.
- Bristol has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 83% in South jordan.
- In South jordan, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Bristol.
- South jordan has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 3% in Bristol.
- Both Bristol and South jordan have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 5%.
- In South jordan, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Bristol.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Bristol | South jordan |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 20.5% | 16.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.0% | 9.0% |
Depression | 31.0% | 26.5% |
Smoking | 22.4% | 7.3% |
Binge Drinking | 13.8% | 16.9% |
Obesity | 37.2% | 28.6% |
Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bristol vs South jordan
- More residents in Bristol report poor mental health at 20.5% compared to 16.7% in South jordan.
- Depression is more prevalent in Bristol at 31.0% compared to 26.5% in South jordan.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Bristol at 22.4% compared to 7.3% in South jordan.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in South jordan at 16.9% compared to 13.8% in Bristol.
- Obesity rates are higher in Bristol at 37.2% compared to 28.6% in South jordan.
- Disability percentages are higher in Bristol at 18.0% compared to 6.0% in South jordan.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Bristol | South jordan |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (171) | 0.2% (172) |
High School Diploma | 16.3% (4,505) | 8.4% (6,995) |
Less than High School | 10.0% (2,781) | 2.7% (2,236) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.2% (5,590) | 27.1% (22,648) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bristol vs South jordan
- A higher percentage of residents in Bristol have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.2% in South jordan.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bristol hold a high school diploma at 16.3% compared to 8.4% in South jordan.
- More residents in Bristol have less than a high school education at 10.0% compared to 2.7% in South jordan.
- In South jordan, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.1% compared to 20.2% in Bristol.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.