Demographics details for Bristol, TN vs Cedar grove, WV
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bristol, TN vs Cedar grove, WV.
Data | Bristol | Cedar grove |
---|---|---|
Population | 27,705 | 693 |
Median Age | 40.2 years | 44.3 years |
Median Income | $49,130 | $55,600 |
Married Families | 37.0% | 31.0% |
Poverty Level | 14% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Bristol vs Cedar grove
- In Bristol, the population is higher at 27,705, compared to 693 in Cedar grove.
- The median age in Cedar grove is higher at 44.3 years, compared to 40.2 years in Bristol.
- Cedar grove has a higher median income of $55,600, compared to $49,130 in Bristol.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Bristol at 37.0% compared to 31.0% in Cedar grove.
- Bristol has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 12% in Cedar grove.
- Cedar grove has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.2% in Bristol.
Demographics
Demographics Bristol vs Cedar grove provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Bristol | Cedar grove |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | Data is updating |
White | 89 | 98 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 3 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 5 | 2 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Bristol vs Cedar grove
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Bristol at 3% compared to 0% in Cedar grove.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cedar grove at 98% compared to 89% in Bristol.
- Both Bristol and Cedar grove have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Bristol at 3% compared to 0% in Cedar grove.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Bristol at 5% compared to 2% in Cedar grove.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Bristol and Cedar grove at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Bristol | Cedar grove |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 20.5% | 22.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.0% | 15.7% |
Depression | 31.0% | 30.1% |
Smoking | 22.4% | 24.6% |
Binge Drinking | 13.8% | 13.9% |
Obesity | 37.2% | 40.4% |
Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bristol vs Cedar grove
- In Cedar grove, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 22.3% compared to 20.5% in Bristol.
- Depression is more prevalent in Bristol at 31.0% compared to 30.1% in Cedar grove.
- Cedar grove has a higher smoking rate at 24.6% compared to 22.4% in Bristol.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cedar grove at 13.9% compared to 13.8% in Bristol.
- Cedar grove has higher obesity rates at 40.4% compared to 37.2% in Bristol.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cedar grove at 20.0% compared to 18.0% in Bristol.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Bristol | Cedar grove |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (171) | 0.6% (4) |
High School Diploma | 16.3% (4,505) | 21.2% (147) |
Less than High School | 10.0% (2,781) | 18.5% (128) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.2% (5,590) | 2.3% (16) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bristol vs Cedar grove
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Bristol and Cedar grove at 0.6%.
- In Cedar grove, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.2% compared to 16.3% in Bristol.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cedar grove at 18.5%, compared to 10.0% in Bristol.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bristol hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.2% compared to 2.3% in Cedar grove.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.