Demographics details for Bristol, TN vs Arvin, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bristol, TN vs Arvin, CA.
| Data | Bristol | Arvin |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 27,705 | 19,611 |
| Median Age | 40.2 years | 24.9 years |
| Median Income | $49,130 | $47,997 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 25% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 6.2 |
Population Comparison: Bristol vs Arvin
- In Bristol, the population is higher at 27,705, compared to 19,611 in Arvin.
- Residents in Bristol have a higher median age of 40.2 years compared to 24.9 years in Arvin.
- Bristol has a higher median income of $49,130 compared to $47,997 in Arvin.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Bristol at 37.0% compared to 32.0% in Arvin.
- The poverty level is higher in Arvin at 25%, compared to 14% in Bristol.
- Arvin has a higher unemployment rate at 6.2% compared to 4.2% in Bristol.
Demographics
Demographics Bristol vs Arvin provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Bristol | Arvin |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 1 |
| White | 89 | -19 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 95 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 21 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Bristol vs Arvin
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Bristol at 3% compared to 1% in Arvin.
- Bristol has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to -19% in Arvin.
- In Arvin, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Bristol.
- Arvin has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 95%, compared to 3% in Bristol.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Arvin at 21%, compared to 5% in Bristol.
- In Arvin, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Bristol.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Bristol | Arvin |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.5% | 20.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.0% | 19.9% |
| Depression | 31.0% | 20.1% |
| Smoking | 22.4% | 21.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.8% | 13.5% |
| Obesity | 37.2% | 42.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bristol vs Arvin
- More residents in Bristol report poor mental health at 20.5% compared to 20.3% in Arvin.
- Depression is more prevalent in Bristol at 31.0% compared to 20.1% in Arvin.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Bristol at 22.4% compared to 21.0% in Arvin.
- Binge drinking is more common in Bristol at 13.8% compared to 13.5% in Arvin.
- Arvin has higher obesity rates at 42.4% compared to 37.2% in Bristol.
- Disability percentages are higher in Bristol at 18.0% compared to 6.0% in Arvin.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Bristol | Arvin |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (171) | 4.3% (840) |
| High School Diploma | 16.3% (4,505) | 11.8% (2,305) |
| Less than High School | 10.0% (2,781) | 53.7% (10,540) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.2% (5,590) | 2.0% (383) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bristol vs Arvin
- In Arvin, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.3% compared to 0.6% in Bristol.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bristol hold a high school diploma at 16.3% compared to 11.8% in Arvin.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Arvin at 53.7%, compared to 10.0% in Bristol.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bristol hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.2% compared to 2.0% in Arvin.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.