Demographics details for Brighton, TN vs Prince frederick, MD

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Brighton, TN vs Prince frederick, MD.

Data Brighton Prince frederick
Population 2,881 2,491
Median Age 30.8 years 38.9 years
Median Income $76,202 $61,293
Married Families 35.0% 33.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 6%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 3.2

Population Comparison: Brighton vs Prince frederick

  • In Brighton, the population is higher at 2,881, compared to 2,491 in Prince frederick.
  • The median age in Prince frederick is higher at 38.9 years, compared to 30.8 years in Brighton.
  • Brighton has a higher median income of $76,202 compared to $61,293 in Prince frederick.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Brighton at 35.0% compared to 33.0% in Prince frederick.
  • The poverty level is higher in Prince frederick at 6%, compared to 0% in Brighton.
  • The unemployment rate in Brighton is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.2% in Prince frederick.

Demographics

Demographics Brighton vs Prince frederick provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Brighton Prince frederick
Black 19 28
White 76 49
Asian Data is updating 2
Hispanic 3 13
Two or More Races 2 8
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Brighton vs Prince frederick

  • In Prince frederick, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 28% compared to 19% in Brighton.
  • Brighton has a higher percentage of White residents at 76% compared to 49% in Prince frederick.
  • In Prince frederick, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Brighton.
  • Prince frederick has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 13%, compared to 3% in Brighton.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Prince frederick at 8%, compared to 2% in Brighton.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Brighton and Prince frederick at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Brighton Prince frederick
Mental Health Not Good 19.0% 16.8%
Physical Health Not Good 12.0% 10.4%
Depression 29.1% 19.6%
Smoking 19.3% 15.6%
Binge Drinking 16.5% 15.9%
Obesity 39.9% 38.7%
Disability Percentage 17.0% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Brighton vs Prince frederick

  • More residents in Brighton report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 16.8% in Prince frederick.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Brighton at 29.1% compared to 19.6% in Prince frederick.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Brighton at 19.3% compared to 15.6% in Prince frederick.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Brighton at 16.5% compared to 15.9% in Prince frederick.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Brighton at 39.9% compared to 38.7% in Prince frederick.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Brighton at 17.0% compared to 14.0% in Prince frederick.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Brighton Prince frederick
No Schooling 1.2% (35) 0.4% (10)
High School Diploma 18.8% (541) 19.1% (476)
Less than High School 8.8% (253) 9.7% (242)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 12.2% (352) 14.4% (358)

Education Levels Comparison: Brighton vs Prince frederick

  • A higher percentage of residents in Brighton have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.4% in Prince frederick.
  • In Prince frederick, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.1% compared to 18.8% in Brighton.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Prince frederick at 9.7%, compared to 8.8% in Brighton.
  • In Prince frederick, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.4% compared to 12.2% in Brighton.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.