Demographics details for Brighton, CO vs Conshohocken, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Brighton, CO vs Conshohocken, PA.
Data | Brighton | Conshohocken |
---|---|---|
Population | 41,881 | 9,255 |
Median Age | 34.5 years | 32.3 years |
Median Income | $86,975 | $114,523 |
Married Families | 40.0% | 39.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Brighton vs Conshohocken
- In Brighton, the population is higher at 41,881, compared to 9,255 in Conshohocken.
- Residents in Brighton have a higher median age of 34.5 years compared to 32.3 years in Conshohocken.
- Conshohocken has a higher median income of $114,523, compared to $86,975 in Brighton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Brighton at 40.0% compared to 39.0% in Conshohocken.
- Brighton has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 5% in Conshohocken.
- The unemployment rate in Brighton is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Conshohocken.
Demographics
Demographics Brighton vs Conshohocken provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Brighton | Conshohocken |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 5 |
White | 42 | 86 |
Asian | 2 | 3 |
Hispanic | 37 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 14 | 4 |
American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Brighton vs Conshohocken
- In Conshohocken, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 3% in Brighton.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Conshohocken at 86% compared to 42% in Brighton.
- In Conshohocken, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 2% in Brighton.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Brighton at 37% compared to 2% in Conshohocken.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Brighton at 14% compared to 4% in Conshohocken.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Brighton at 2% compared to 0% in Conshohocken.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Brighton | Conshohocken |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.9% | 13.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.0% | 8.4% |
Depression | 21.6% | 20.1% |
Smoking | 15.0% | 11.6% |
Binge Drinking | 21.5% | 19.4% |
Obesity | 30.9% | 30.2% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Brighton vs Conshohocken
- More residents in Brighton report poor mental health at 14.9% compared to 13.8% in Conshohocken.
- Depression is more prevalent in Brighton at 21.6% compared to 20.1% in Conshohocken.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Brighton at 15.0% compared to 11.6% in Conshohocken.
- Binge drinking is more common in Brighton at 21.5% compared to 19.4% in Conshohocken.
- Obesity rates are higher in Brighton at 30.9% compared to 30.2% in Conshohocken.
- Disability percentages are higher in Brighton at 10.0% compared to 8.0% in Conshohocken.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Brighton | Conshohocken |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.6% (665) | 0.3% (26) |
High School Diploma | 14.9% (6,256) | 14.0% (1,292) |
Less than High School | 18.0% (7,528) | 4.2% (388) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.9% (5,814) | 50.2% (4,643) |
Education Levels Comparison: Brighton vs Conshohocken
- A higher percentage of residents in Brighton have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.3% in Conshohocken.
- A higher percentage of residents in Brighton hold a high school diploma at 14.9% compared to 14.0% in Conshohocken.
- More residents in Brighton have less than a high school education at 18.0% compared to 4.2% in Conshohocken.
- In Conshohocken, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 50.2% compared to 13.9% in Brighton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.