Demographics details for Bridgeville, DE vs Parker, SD
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bridgeville, DE vs Parker, SD.
| Data | Bridgeville | Parker |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,752 | 1,221 |
| Median Age | 57.3 years | 39.3 years |
| Median Income | $61,523 | $83,864 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 2.0 |
Population Comparison: Bridgeville vs Parker
- In Bridgeville, the population is higher at 2,752, compared to 1,221 in Parker.
- Residents in Bridgeville have a higher median age of 57.3 years compared to 39.3 years in Parker.
- Parker has a higher median income of $83,864, compared to $61,523 in Bridgeville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Bridgeville at 42.0% compared to 39.0% in Parker.
- Bridgeville has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 5% in Parker.
- The unemployment rate in Bridgeville is higher at 3.8%, compared to 2.0% in Parker.
Demographics
Demographics Bridgeville vs Parker provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Bridgeville | Parker |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 25 | 4 |
| White | 60 | 85 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 11 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Bridgeville vs Parker
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Bridgeville at 25% compared to 4% in Parker.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Parker at 85% compared to 60% in Bridgeville.
- Both Bridgeville and Parker have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Bridgeville at 11% compared to 5% in Parker.
- Both Bridgeville and Parker have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 4%.
- In Parker, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Bridgeville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Bridgeville | Parker |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.7% | 13.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 9.0% |
| Depression | 18.8% | 17.8% |
| Smoking | 18.9% | 16.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.2% | 20.4% |
| Obesity | 39.5% | 34.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 5.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bridgeville vs Parker
- More residents in Bridgeville report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 13.5% in Parker.
- Depression is more prevalent in Bridgeville at 18.8% compared to 17.8% in Parker.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Bridgeville at 18.9% compared to 16.4% in Parker.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Parker at 20.4% compared to 15.2% in Bridgeville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Bridgeville at 39.5% compared to 34.4% in Parker.
- Disability percentages are higher in Bridgeville at 10.0% compared to 5.0% in Parker.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Bridgeville | Parker |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (14) | 0.2% (3) |
| High School Diploma | 17.6% (484) | 17.9% (218) |
| Less than High School | 13.7% (378) | 13.0% (159) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 24.9% (686) | 12.9% (158) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bridgeville vs Parker
- A higher percentage of residents in Bridgeville have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.2% in Parker.
- In Parker, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.9% compared to 17.6% in Bridgeville.
- More residents in Bridgeville have less than a high school education at 13.7% compared to 13.0% in Parker.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bridgeville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.9% compared to 12.9% in Parker.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.