Demographics details for Bridgeville, DE vs Ladson, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bridgeville, DE vs Ladson, SC.
Data | Bridgeville | Ladson |
---|---|---|
Population | 2,752 | 15,298 |
Median Age | 57.3 years | 34.7 years |
Median Income | $61,523 | $74,020 |
Married Families | 42.0% | 32.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Bridgeville vs Ladson
- The population in Ladson is higher at 15,298, compared to 2,752 in Bridgeville.
- Residents in Bridgeville have a higher median age of 57.3 years compared to 34.7 years in Ladson.
- Ladson has a higher median income of $74,020, compared to $61,523 in Bridgeville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Bridgeville at 42.0% compared to 32.0% in Ladson.
- The poverty level is higher in Ladson at 10%, compared to 9% in Bridgeville.
- The unemployment rate in Bridgeville is higher at 3.8%, compared to 3.5% in Ladson.
Demographics
Demographics Bridgeville vs Ladson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Bridgeville | Ladson |
---|---|---|
Black | 25 | 29 |
White | 60 | 49 |
Asian | Data is updating | 4 |
Hispanic | 11 | 9 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 8 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Bridgeville vs Ladson
- In Ladson, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 29% compared to 25% in Bridgeville.
- Bridgeville has a higher percentage of White residents at 60% compared to 49% in Ladson.
- In Ladson, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Bridgeville.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Bridgeville at 11% compared to 9% in Ladson.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Ladson at 8%, compared to 4% in Bridgeville.
- In Ladson, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Bridgeville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Bridgeville | Ladson |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.7% | 17.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 11.5% |
Depression | 18.8% | 19.4% |
Smoking | 18.9% | 17.1% |
Binge Drinking | 15.2% | 19.4% |
Obesity | 39.5% | 38.5% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bridgeville vs Ladson
- In Ladson, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.4% compared to 16.7% in Bridgeville.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Ladson at 19.4% versus 18.8% in Bridgeville.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Bridgeville at 18.9% compared to 17.1% in Ladson.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Ladson at 19.4% compared to 15.2% in Bridgeville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Bridgeville at 39.5% compared to 38.5% in Ladson.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Ladson at 16.0% compared to 10.0% in Bridgeville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Bridgeville | Ladson |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (14) | 0.7% (105) |
High School Diploma | 17.6% (484) | 14.0% (2,141) |
Less than High School | 13.7% (378) | 13.9% (2,130) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 24.9% (686) | 13.5% (2,065) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bridgeville vs Ladson
- In Ladson, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.5% in Bridgeville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bridgeville hold a high school diploma at 17.6% compared to 14.0% in Ladson.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Ladson at 13.9%, compared to 13.7% in Bridgeville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bridgeville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.9% compared to 13.5% in Ladson.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.