Demographics details for Bridgeport, WV vs Mead, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bridgeport, WV vs Mead, WA.
| Data | Bridgeport | Mead |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 9,310 | 7,275 |
| Median Age | 45.1 years | 36.0 years |
| Median Income | $96,063 | $85,000 |
| Married Families | 46.0% | 55.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Bridgeport vs Mead
- In Bridgeport, the population is higher at 9,310, compared to 7,275 in Mead.
- Residents in Bridgeport have a higher median age of 45.1 years compared to 36.0 years in Mead.
- Bridgeport has a higher median income of $96,063 compared to $85,000 in Mead.
- In Mead, the percentage of married families is higher at 55.0%, compared to 46.0% in Bridgeport.
- Bridgeport has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 5% in Mead.
- The unemployment rate in Bridgeport is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.0% in Mead.
Demographics
Demographics Bridgeport vs Mead provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Bridgeport | Mead |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 1 |
| White | 90 | 95 |
| Asian | 3 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Bridgeport vs Mead
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Bridgeport at 2% compared to 1% in Mead.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Mead at 95% compared to 90% in Bridgeport.
- The Asian population is larger in Bridgeport at 3% compared to 2% in Mead.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Bridgeport at 3% compared to 1% in Mead.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Bridgeport at 2% compared to 1% in Mead.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Bridgeport and Mead at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Bridgeport | Mead |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.5% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 24.8% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 13.3% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.1% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 32.2% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bridgeport vs Mead
- More residents in Bridgeport report poor mental health at 15.4% compared to 0.0% in Mead.
- Depression is more prevalent in Bridgeport at 24.8% compared to 0.0% in Mead.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Bridgeport at 13.3% compared to 0.0% in Mead.
- Binge drinking is more common in Bridgeport at 15.1% compared to 0.0% in Mead.
- Obesity rates are higher in Bridgeport at 32.2% compared to 0.0% in Mead.
- Disability percentages are higher in Bridgeport at 10.0% compared to 0.0% in Mead.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Bridgeport | Mead |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.1% (6) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 13.2% (1,231) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 4.0% (371) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 41.9% (3,903) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bridgeport vs Mead
- A higher percentage of residents in Bridgeport have no formal schooling at 0.1% compared to 0.0% in Mead.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bridgeport hold a high school diploma at 13.2% compared to 0.0% in Mead.
- More residents in Bridgeport have less than a high school education at 4.0% compared to 0.0% in Mead.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bridgeport hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 41.9% compared to 0.0% in Mead.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.