Demographics details for Bridgeport, WV vs Gardner, MA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bridgeport, WV vs Gardner, MA.
| Data | Bridgeport | Gardner |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 9,310 | 20,902 |
| Median Age | 45.1 years | 45.0 years |
| Median Income | $96,063 | $56,974 |
| Married Families | 46.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Population Comparison: Bridgeport vs Gardner
- The population in Gardner is higher at 20,902, compared to 9,310 in Bridgeport.
- Residents in Bridgeport have a higher median age of 45.1 years compared to 45.0 years in Gardner.
- Bridgeport has a higher median income of $96,063 compared to $56,974 in Gardner.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Bridgeport at 46.0% compared to 38.0% in Gardner.
- The poverty level is higher in Gardner at 9%, compared to 8% in Bridgeport.
- Gardner has a higher unemployment rate at 4.6% compared to 4.5% in Bridgeport.
Demographics
Demographics Bridgeport vs Gardner provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Bridgeport | Gardner |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 2 |
| White | 90 | 82 |
| Asian | 3 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Bridgeport vs Gardner
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Bridgeport and Gardner at 2%.
- Bridgeport has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 82% in Gardner.
- Both Bridgeport and Gardner have the same percentage of Asian residents at 3%.
- Gardner has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 3% in Bridgeport.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Gardner at 5%, compared to 2% in Bridgeport.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Bridgeport and Gardner at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Bridgeport | Gardner |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | 18.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.5% | 11.1% |
| Depression | 24.8% | 24.4% |
| Smoking | 13.3% | 17.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.1% | 17.6% |
| Obesity | 32.2% | 33.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bridgeport vs Gardner
- In Gardner, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 15.4% in Bridgeport.
- Depression is more prevalent in Bridgeport at 24.8% compared to 24.4% in Gardner.
- Gardner has a higher smoking rate at 17.3% compared to 13.3% in Bridgeport.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Gardner at 17.6% compared to 15.1% in Bridgeport.
- Gardner has higher obesity rates at 33.5% compared to 32.2% in Bridgeport.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Gardner at 14.0% compared to 10.0% in Bridgeport.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Bridgeport | Gardner |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.1% (6) | 1.3% (276) |
| High School Diploma | 13.2% (1,231) | 21.5% (4,487) |
| Less than High School | 4.0% (371) | 16.8% (3,513) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 41.9% (3,903) | 15.0% (3,133) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bridgeport vs Gardner
- In Gardner, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.1% in Bridgeport.
- In Gardner, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.5% compared to 13.2% in Bridgeport.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Gardner at 16.8%, compared to 4.0% in Bridgeport.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bridgeport hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 41.9% compared to 15.0% in Gardner.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.