Demographics details for Bridgeport, TX vs Woodland, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bridgeport, TX vs Woodland, PA.
Data | Bridgeport | Woodland |
---|---|---|
Population | 6,321 | 185 |
Median Age | 33.9 years | 36.0 years |
Median Income | $96,231 | $55,000 |
Married Families | 38.0% | 30.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Bridgeport vs Woodland
- In Bridgeport, the population is higher at 6,321, compared to 185 in Woodland.
- The median age in Woodland is higher at 36.0 years, compared to 33.9 years in Bridgeport.
- Bridgeport has a higher median income of $96,231 compared to $55,000 in Woodland.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Bridgeport at 38.0% compared to 30.0% in Woodland.
- The poverty level is identical in both Bridgeport and Woodland at 10%.
- Woodland has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.2% in Bridgeport.
Demographics
Demographics Bridgeport vs Woodland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Bridgeport | Woodland |
---|---|---|
Black | 5 | 3 |
White | 51 | 92 |
Asian | 1 | 2 |
Hispanic | 36 | 1 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 2 |
American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Bridgeport vs Woodland
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Bridgeport at 5% compared to 3% in Woodland.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Woodland at 92% compared to 51% in Bridgeport.
- In Woodland, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Bridgeport.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Bridgeport at 36% compared to 1% in Woodland.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Bridgeport at 5% compared to 2% in Woodland.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Bridgeport at 2% compared to 0% in Woodland.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Bridgeport | Woodland |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.6% | Data is updating% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.3% | Data is updating% |
Depression | 24.0% | Data is updating% |
Smoking | 20.2% | Data is updating% |
Binge Drinking | 17.2% | Data is updating% |
Obesity | 40.0% | Data is updating% |
Disability Percentage | 7.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bridgeport vs Woodland
- More residents in Bridgeport report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 0.0% in Woodland.
- Depression is more prevalent in Bridgeport at 24.0% compared to 0.0% in Woodland.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Bridgeport at 20.2% compared to 0.0% in Woodland.
- Binge drinking is more common in Bridgeport at 17.2% compared to 0.0% in Woodland.
- Obesity rates are higher in Bridgeport at 40.0% compared to 0.0% in Woodland.
- Disability percentages are higher in Bridgeport at 7.0% compared to 0.0% in Woodland.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Bridgeport | Woodland |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (24) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 11.2% (708) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Less than High School | 18.8% (1,189) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.2% (1,086) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bridgeport vs Woodland
- A higher percentage of residents in Bridgeport have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Woodland.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bridgeport hold a high school diploma at 11.2% compared to 0.0% in Woodland.
- More residents in Bridgeport have less than a high school education at 18.8% compared to 0.0% in Woodland.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bridgeport hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.2% compared to 0.0% in Woodland.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.