Demographics details for Bridgeport, TX vs Piper city, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bridgeport, TX vs Piper city, IL.
Data | Bridgeport | Piper city |
---|---|---|
Population | 6,321 | 729 |
Median Age | 33.9 years | 48.3 years |
Median Income | $96,231 | $38,750 |
Married Families | 38.0% | 40.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 11% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Bridgeport vs Piper city
- In Bridgeport, the population is higher at 6,321, compared to 729 in Piper city.
- The median age in Piper city is higher at 48.3 years, compared to 33.9 years in Bridgeport.
- Bridgeport has a higher median income of $96,231 compared to $38,750 in Piper city.
- In Piper city, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 38.0% in Bridgeport.
- The poverty level is higher in Piper city at 11%, compared to 10% in Bridgeport.
- The unemployment rate in Bridgeport is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.2% in Piper city.
Demographics
Demographics Bridgeport vs Piper city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Bridgeport | Piper city |
---|---|---|
Black | 5 | 2 |
White | 51 | 94 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 36 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 1 |
American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Bridgeport vs Piper city
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Bridgeport at 5% compared to 2% in Piper city.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Piper city at 94% compared to 51% in Bridgeport.
- The Asian population is larger in Bridgeport at 1% compared to 0% in Piper city.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Bridgeport at 36% compared to 3% in Piper city.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Bridgeport at 5% compared to 1% in Piper city.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Bridgeport at 2% compared to 0% in Piper city.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Bridgeport | Piper city |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.6% | 17.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.3% | 12.8% |
Depression | 24.0% | 23.2% |
Smoking | 20.2% | 20.6% |
Binge Drinking | 17.2% | 17.3% |
Obesity | 40.0% | 38.4% |
Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 26.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bridgeport vs Piper city
- More residents in Bridgeport report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 17.8% in Piper city.
- Depression is more prevalent in Bridgeport at 24.0% compared to 23.2% in Piper city.
- Piper city has a higher smoking rate at 20.6% compared to 20.2% in Bridgeport.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Piper city at 17.3% compared to 17.2% in Bridgeport.
- Obesity rates are higher in Bridgeport at 40.0% compared to 38.4% in Piper city.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Piper city at 26.0% compared to 7.0% in Bridgeport.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Bridgeport | Piper city |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (24) | 0.1% (1) |
High School Diploma | 11.2% (708) | 30.3% (221) |
Less than High School | 18.8% (1,189) | 10.8% (79) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.2% (1,086) | 5.8% (42) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bridgeport vs Piper city
- A higher percentage of residents in Bridgeport have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.1% in Piper city.
- In Piper city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 30.3% compared to 11.2% in Bridgeport.
- More residents in Bridgeport have less than a high school education at 18.8% compared to 10.8% in Piper city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bridgeport hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.2% compared to 5.8% in Piper city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.