Demographics details for Bridgeport, TX vs Irvine, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bridgeport, TX vs Irvine, CA.
| Data | Bridgeport | Irvine |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 6,321 | 313,685 |
| Median Age | 33.9 years | 33.8 years |
| Median Income | $96,231 | $122,948 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Bridgeport vs Irvine
- The population in Irvine is higher at 313,685, compared to 6,321 in Bridgeport.
- Residents in Bridgeport have a higher median age of 33.9 years compared to 33.8 years in Irvine.
- Irvine has a higher median income of $122,948, compared to $96,231 in Bridgeport.
- In Irvine, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 38.0% in Bridgeport.
- Bridgeport has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 6% in Irvine.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Bridgeport and Irvine at 4.2%.
Demographics
Demographics Bridgeport vs Irvine provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Bridgeport | Irvine |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 2 |
| White | 51 | 34 |
| Asian | 1 | 43 |
| Hispanic | 36 | 11 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 10 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Bridgeport vs Irvine
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Bridgeport at 5% compared to 2% in Irvine.
- Bridgeport has a higher percentage of White residents at 51% compared to 34% in Irvine.
- In Irvine, the Asian population stands at 43%, greater than 1% in Bridgeport.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Bridgeport at 36% compared to 11% in Irvine.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Irvine at 10%, compared to 5% in Bridgeport.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Bridgeport at 2% compared to 0% in Irvine.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Bridgeport | Irvine |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.6% | 12.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.3% | 7.7% |
| Depression | 24.0% | 15.4% |
| Smoking | 20.2% | 7.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.2% | 14.9% |
| Obesity | 40.0% | 21.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 5.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bridgeport vs Irvine
- More residents in Bridgeport report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 12.7% in Irvine.
- Depression is more prevalent in Bridgeport at 24.0% compared to 15.4% in Irvine.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Bridgeport at 20.2% compared to 7.5% in Irvine.
- Binge drinking is more common in Bridgeport at 17.2% compared to 14.9% in Irvine.
- Obesity rates are higher in Bridgeport at 40.0% compared to 21.0% in Irvine.
- Disability percentages are higher in Bridgeport at 7.0% compared to 5.0% in Irvine.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Bridgeport | Irvine |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (24) | 0.8% (2,579) |
| High School Diploma | 11.2% (708) | 3.8% (12,010) |
| Less than High School | 18.8% (1,189) | 3.4% (10,664) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.2% (1,086) | 44.3% (138,926) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bridgeport vs Irvine
- In Irvine, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.4% in Bridgeport.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bridgeport hold a high school diploma at 11.2% compared to 3.8% in Irvine.
- More residents in Bridgeport have less than a high school education at 18.8% compared to 3.4% in Irvine.
- In Irvine, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 44.3% compared to 17.2% in Bridgeport.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.