Demographics details for Bridgeport, TX vs Franklin park, IL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Bridgeport, TX vs Franklin park, IL.

Data Bridgeport Franklin park
Population 6,321 18,059
Median Age 33.9 years 36.5 years
Median Income $96,231 $74,167
Married Families 38.0% 36.0%
Poverty Level 10% 9%
Unemployment Rate 4.2 5.1

Population Comparison: Bridgeport vs Franklin park

  • The population in Franklin park is higher at 18,059, compared to 6,321 in Bridgeport.
  • The median age in Franklin park is higher at 36.5 years, compared to 33.9 years in Bridgeport.
  • Bridgeport has a higher median income of $96,231 compared to $74,167 in Franklin park.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Bridgeport at 38.0% compared to 36.0% in Franklin park.
  • Bridgeport has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 9% in Franklin park.
  • Franklin park has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 4.2% in Bridgeport.

Demographics

Demographics Bridgeport vs Franklin park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Bridgeport Franklin park
Black 5 1
White 51 10
Asian 1 5
Hispanic 36 59
Two or More Races 5 23
American Indian 2 2

Demographics Comparison: Bridgeport vs Franklin park

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Bridgeport at 5% compared to 1% in Franklin park.
  • Bridgeport has a higher percentage of White residents at 51% compared to 10% in Franklin park.
  • In Franklin park, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 1% in Bridgeport.
  • Franklin park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 59%, compared to 36% in Bridgeport.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Franklin park at 23%, compared to 5% in Bridgeport.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Bridgeport and Franklin park at 2%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Bridgeport Franklin park
Mental Health Not Good 18.6% 14.2%
Physical Health Not Good 14.3% 10.9%
Depression 24.0% 17.7%
Smoking 20.2% 14.4%
Binge Drinking 17.2% 18.9%
Obesity 40.0% 30.9%
Disability Percentage 7.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Bridgeport vs Franklin park

  • More residents in Bridgeport report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 14.2% in Franklin park.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Bridgeport at 24.0% compared to 17.7% in Franklin park.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Bridgeport at 20.2% compared to 14.4% in Franklin park.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Franklin park at 18.9% compared to 17.2% in Bridgeport.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Bridgeport at 40.0% compared to 30.9% in Franklin park.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Franklin park at 11.0% compared to 7.0% in Bridgeport.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Bridgeport Franklin park
No Schooling 0.4% (24) 2.5% (453)
High School Diploma 11.2% (708) 17.0% (3,067)
Less than High School 18.8% (1,189) 30.2% (5,452)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 17.2% (1,086) 12.7% (2,297)

Education Levels Comparison: Bridgeport vs Franklin park

  • In Franklin park, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 0.4% in Bridgeport.
  • In Franklin park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.0% compared to 11.2% in Bridgeport.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Franklin park at 30.2%, compared to 18.8% in Bridgeport.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Bridgeport hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.2% compared to 12.7% in Franklin park.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.