Demographics details for Bridgeport, TX vs Arkadelphia, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bridgeport, TX vs Arkadelphia, AR.
Data | Bridgeport | Arkadelphia |
---|---|---|
Population | 6,321 | 10,258 |
Median Age | 33.9 years | 23.3 years |
Median Income | $96,231 | $37,634 |
Married Families | 38.0% | 23.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 21% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Bridgeport vs Arkadelphia
- The population in Arkadelphia is higher at 10,258, compared to 6,321 in Bridgeport.
- Residents in Bridgeport have a higher median age of 33.9 years compared to 23.3 years in Arkadelphia.
- Bridgeport has a higher median income of $96,231 compared to $37,634 in Arkadelphia.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Bridgeport at 38.0% compared to 23.0% in Arkadelphia.
- The poverty level is higher in Arkadelphia at 21%, compared to 10% in Bridgeport.
- Arkadelphia has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.2% in Bridgeport.
Demographics
Demographics Bridgeport vs Arkadelphia provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Bridgeport | Arkadelphia |
---|---|---|
Black | 5 | 31 |
White | 51 | 58 |
Asian | 1 | 1 |
Hispanic | 36 | 6 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 4 |
American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Bridgeport vs Arkadelphia
- In Arkadelphia, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 31% compared to 5% in Bridgeport.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Arkadelphia at 58% compared to 51% in Bridgeport.
- Both Bridgeport and Arkadelphia have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Bridgeport at 36% compared to 6% in Arkadelphia.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Bridgeport at 5% compared to 4% in Arkadelphia.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Bridgeport at 2% compared to 0% in Arkadelphia.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Bridgeport | Arkadelphia |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.6% | 19.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.3% | 14.1% |
Depression | 24.0% | 25.8% |
Smoking | 20.2% | 20.7% |
Binge Drinking | 17.2% | 13.5% |
Obesity | 40.0% | 44.3% |
Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bridgeport vs Arkadelphia
- In Arkadelphia, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 18.6% in Bridgeport.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Arkadelphia at 25.8% versus 24.0% in Bridgeport.
- Arkadelphia has a higher smoking rate at 20.7% compared to 20.2% in Bridgeport.
- Binge drinking is more common in Bridgeport at 17.2% compared to 13.5% in Arkadelphia.
- Arkadelphia has higher obesity rates at 44.3% compared to 40.0% in Bridgeport.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Arkadelphia at 20.0% compared to 7.0% in Bridgeport.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Bridgeport | Arkadelphia |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (24) | 0.2% (25) |
High School Diploma | 11.2% (708) | 11.3% (1,157) |
Less than High School | 18.8% (1,189) | 5.4% (559) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.2% (1,086) | 15.6% (1,598) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bridgeport vs Arkadelphia
- A higher percentage of residents in Bridgeport have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.2% in Arkadelphia.
- In Arkadelphia, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 11.3% compared to 11.2% in Bridgeport.
- More residents in Bridgeport have less than a high school education at 18.8% compared to 5.4% in Arkadelphia.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bridgeport hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.2% compared to 15.6% in Arkadelphia.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.