Demographics details for Bridgeport, CT vs Yucca valley, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bridgeport, CT vs Yucca valley, CA.
Data | Bridgeport | Yucca valley |
---|---|---|
Population | 148,377 | 21,662 |
Median Age | 37.5 years | 39.9 years |
Median Income | $54,440 | $54,153 |
Married Families | 29.0% | 34.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.4 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Bridgeport vs Yucca valley
- In Bridgeport, the population is higher at 148,377, compared to 21,662 in Yucca valley.
- The median age in Yucca valley is higher at 39.9 years, compared to 37.5 years in Bridgeport.
- Bridgeport has a higher median income of $54,440 compared to $54,153 in Yucca valley.
- In Yucca valley, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 29.0% in Bridgeport.
- The poverty level is identical in both Bridgeport and Yucca valley at 12%.
- Yucca valley has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 4.4% in Bridgeport.
Demographics
Demographics Bridgeport vs Yucca valley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Bridgeport | Yucca valley |
---|---|---|
Black | 22 | 4 |
White | 26 | 51 |
Asian | 7 | 2 |
Hispanic | 36 | 25 |
Two or More Races | 9 | 16 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Bridgeport vs Yucca valley
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Bridgeport at 22% compared to 4% in Yucca valley.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Yucca valley at 51% compared to 26% in Bridgeport.
- The Asian population is larger in Bridgeport at 7% compared to 2% in Yucca valley.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Bridgeport at 36% compared to 25% in Yucca valley.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Yucca valley at 16%, compared to 9% in Bridgeport.
- In Yucca valley, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Bridgeport.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Bridgeport | Yucca valley |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 19.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.3% | 13.6% |
Depression | 18.2% | 22.0% |
Smoking | 18.2% | 16.7% |
Binge Drinking | 13.7% | 16.4% |
Obesity | 32.7% | 38.8% |
Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bridgeport vs Yucca valley
- In Yucca valley, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 17.0% in Bridgeport.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Yucca valley at 22.0% versus 18.2% in Bridgeport.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Bridgeport at 18.2% compared to 16.7% in Yucca valley.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Yucca valley at 16.4% compared to 13.7% in Bridgeport.
- Yucca valley has higher obesity rates at 38.8% compared to 32.7% in Bridgeport.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Yucca valley at 20.0% compared to 15.0% in Bridgeport.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Bridgeport | Yucca valley |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.5% (3,659) | 0.9% (191) |
High School Diploma | 18.7% (27,806) | 17.3% (3,754) |
Less than High School | 23.9% (35,520) | 15.6% (3,383) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.8% (24,999) | 13.4% (2,907) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bridgeport vs Yucca valley
- A higher percentage of residents in Bridgeport have no formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 0.9% in Yucca valley.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bridgeport hold a high school diploma at 18.7% compared to 17.3% in Yucca valley.
- More residents in Bridgeport have less than a high school education at 23.9% compared to 15.6% in Yucca valley.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bridgeport hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.8% compared to 13.4% in Yucca valley.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.