Demographics details for Bridgeport, CT vs Yucca valley, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Bridgeport, CT vs Yucca valley, CA.

Data Bridgeport Yucca valley
Population 148,377 21,662
Median Age 37.5 years 39.9 years
Median Income $54,440 $54,153
Married Families 29.0% 34.0%
Poverty Level 12% 12%
Unemployment Rate 4.4 5.2

Population Comparison: Bridgeport vs Yucca valley

  • In Bridgeport, the population is higher at 148,377, compared to 21,662 in Yucca valley.
  • The median age in Yucca valley is higher at 39.9 years, compared to 37.5 years in Bridgeport.
  • Bridgeport has a higher median income of $54,440 compared to $54,153 in Yucca valley.
  • In Yucca valley, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 29.0% in Bridgeport.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Bridgeport and Yucca valley at 12%.
  • Yucca valley has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 4.4% in Bridgeport.

Demographics

Demographics Bridgeport vs Yucca valley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Bridgeport Yucca valley
Black 22 4
White 26 51
Asian 7 2
Hispanic 36 25
Two or More Races 9 16
American Indian Data is updating 2

Demographics Comparison: Bridgeport vs Yucca valley

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Bridgeport at 22% compared to 4% in Yucca valley.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Yucca valley at 51% compared to 26% in Bridgeport.
  • The Asian population is larger in Bridgeport at 7% compared to 2% in Yucca valley.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Bridgeport at 36% compared to 25% in Yucca valley.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Yucca valley at 16%, compared to 9% in Bridgeport.
  • In Yucca valley, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Bridgeport.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Bridgeport Yucca valley
Mental Health Not Good 17.0% 19.2%
Physical Health Not Good 13.3% 13.6%
Depression 18.2% 22.0%
Smoking 18.2% 16.7%
Binge Drinking 13.7% 16.4%
Obesity 32.7% 38.8%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 20.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Bridgeport vs Yucca valley

  • In Yucca valley, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 17.0% in Bridgeport.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Yucca valley at 22.0% versus 18.2% in Bridgeport.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Bridgeport at 18.2% compared to 16.7% in Yucca valley.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Yucca valley at 16.4% compared to 13.7% in Bridgeport.
  • Yucca valley has higher obesity rates at 38.8% compared to 32.7% in Bridgeport.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Yucca valley at 20.0% compared to 15.0% in Bridgeport.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Bridgeport Yucca valley
No Schooling 2.5% (3,659) 0.9% (191)
High School Diploma 18.7% (27,806) 17.3% (3,754)
Less than High School 23.9% (35,520) 15.6% (3,383)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 16.8% (24,999) 13.4% (2,907)

Education Levels Comparison: Bridgeport vs Yucca valley

  • A higher percentage of residents in Bridgeport have no formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 0.9% in Yucca valley.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Bridgeport hold a high school diploma at 18.7% compared to 17.3% in Yucca valley.
  • More residents in Bridgeport have less than a high school education at 23.9% compared to 15.6% in Yucca valley.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Bridgeport hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.8% compared to 13.4% in Yucca valley.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.